Death and Taxes Series 2

:)


Download 0.87 Mb.
Page1/17
Date conversion01.11.2017
Size0.87 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17
Death and Taxes

Series 2

Table of Contents
Chapter One

1:1 – The Basics

1:2 – In the Beginning

1:3 – Heirs of an Estate

1:4 – Place Your Bets
Chapter Two

2:1 – Transfers in Contemplation of Death

2:2 – Grantor’s Power

2:2a – Supporting Docs

2:3 – 26§2208 vs. 26§2209
Chapter Three

3:1 – Qualified Heir


Chapter Four

4:1 – Sovereign or Employee

4:2 – The Not so Innocent Political Contribution

4:3 – Qualified Domestic Trust

4:4 – Innocent Spouse Relief

4:5 – Real Property Connected with the U.S.


Chapter Five

5:1a – Definition of Executor

5:1b – Special Lien for Estate & Gift Tax

5:2 – Extension of Time

5:3 – Loss of Nationality by Voluntary Action

Prerequisite Study:


Series One

Introduction


The Constitution is an Express Trust

Doctrine of Election

Constitutional Death by Election

Property Belonging to the United States Includes...

Organizing the Territory of Nevada
Various Acts of Congress  (Parts 1-4)

A Brief Chronology (Parts 1-3)

Reconstruction Acts

Legal Tender Cases

Pre 1940

Post 1940


Follow the Yellow Brick Road (Part 1-4)
6 CJS Appearance § 1 – End

7 CJS Assume – End

12 CJS Cancel, Cancellation, Cancellatura – End

12 CJS Cancellation of Instruments § 1 – End

16 CJS Constitutional Law § 227 (dower & curtesy) – End

25 CJS Curtesy § 1, Curtilage – End

31 CJS Estates § 1 – 29

31 CJS Estates § 30 – 67

31 CJS Estates § 68 – 104

31 CJS Estates § 105 – 144

31 CJS Evidence § 1

35 CJS Executions § 36 (only)

36 CJS Fee § 1 – End

40 CJS Homesteads § 1

73 CJS Property § 1

84 CJS Taxation § 59 – Persons Liable

89 CJS Trust, Trustee, Trustator – End

89 CJS Trusts § 1

94 Wills § 1
The Basics

Lesson 1:1


 

Supposing man ‘A’ was to write a trust leaving a certain sum of money to man B. No law stipulates B must or mustn’t accept the gift from A nor is there a law preventing B from giving the gift to C. Supposing A died, if B were to refuse the gift altogether the property would remain in an unclaimed trust account. Agreed?

We’re all in this mess. If in the beginning the people that pledge their lives, fortunes, and honor did so to support that trust document, to support being represented, to create something for their grandchildren had known what was really going on in D.C we probably wouldn’t be in this mess. We’ve got to understand at the time the Constitution was drafted, how did news travel? Most received news by word of mouth through attending church. All these quote ‘religious societies’ are protected by the first amendment regardless of whether or not they’re founded on biblical principle. It’s a way people believe – ‘thought consciousness’ – freedom to make a choice – freedom within an election to advance a particular choice – freedom to acquire and dispose of property according to ones will. (Gen 1:26) And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. In the beginning there were no men to make law. The creator of all is the creator of law and it is He who endowed (more than just “gave”) all men with certain undeniable rights. The current structure is designed to dissuade, make us feel incompetent while concluding it’s impossible to undertake the task we’re working on now. I believe we must operate on the presumption justice does indeed prevail.

 


Psalm 14:1 The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. ….. Psalm 24:1 The earth is the LORD's, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. Deuteronomy 10:14 Behold, the heaven and the heaven of heavens is the LORD's thy God, the earth also, with all that therein is. 1 Corinthians 10:26 For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof.


Whenever land is described on paper it becomes property. Are we on the same page? Who lays claim to “title” and ownership? (Answer: see above quotes) When looking up the word ‘code’ in Webster’s Dictionary we find it means “hidden” like in “Morris code” or ‘occult’. It’s important to note here the writing of “code” originates with Hammurabi the sixth king of Babylon but declared the first king of the ‘empire’ by his father in about 1750 before the common era. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammurabi : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi Law and code, although sometimes synonymous are often antonymous. We have to understand that the law has been perfected over a period of thousands of years. Once society understood and complied with certain laws, those laws couldn’t simply be erased from the books at a later date without effecting the sells, trade, and exchanges that took place prior to the amendments. For literally thousand of years our parents, grandparents, and great grandparents have been victimized by a certain conditioning. We, you and I today, carry forward the interests and impulses of our parents through our DNA. As the living representatives we have the ability to return much more than our estates. We have the ability to activate a part of our brain that hasn’t been used in quite some time.

We’ve all read about the conspiracies regarding monetary control but what we haven’t been reading is the method with which Congress has released us. This remedy (as I believe exist) has been available for nearly thirty years now, but everybody’s arguing KEN vs. Ken, finding a particular statute identifying a liability, whether they live, dwell, reside etc., within the United States and like kind. That’s not to subtract from the numerous exempt organizations effectively working the remedy, i.e. DAR, (Daughters of the American Revolution) SAR, (Sons…) to name a couple.

 


I want you to know that the course President Bush/Bama has commissioned is more or less, word for word, as said in the Reconstruction Acts. In comparison everything we’re doing is prescribed in law and according to good conscience. However, as we know justice usually translates into just-us. So, whether the IRS and/or the courts will comply is an entirely different subject matter. When we hear on the television an attorney repeat, “it’s too bad we have to file a writ of H.C in the federal courts because of all the corruption at the state level,” One surely is left wondering whether justice will prevail. What is the number of men and women entering the field of law only to be left disgruntled with the entire process? The hours, dollars, and sacrifices made to attain that particular profession, wasted!


We now have this forum to debate our inconsistencies and misunderstandings. I’m neither a paralegal nor an attorney and surely I don’t profess to understand every section or word of the IRC, but perhaps what I may not realize another might. United we stand, divided we fall. Because only we can best re-present our case the issue becomes a matter of study. I can neither re-present you nor visa versa. We therefore must study to show ourselves approved when attempting to imitate He who created us.

What is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? How can one be sure that what he understands is the truth? By far, one of the most perfect documents ever designed is that 1040 Form. I believe within it lies the trap catching us all. Failing to know the proper rebuttal and/or placing reliance in the interpretation of another i.e. hearsay can wreak havoc in a courtroom. Supposing one question arises wherein we find it difficult to answer we’re railroaded into a [rush for judgment]. Ergo, integrity and accountability coupled with the armor of Christ we can prevail. Philippians 4:13 I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me. http://www.biblegateway.com

Yes, the law is convoluted and yes, the law is confusing and difficult to understand but we’ve got to grasp the fact that the international bansters have deep pockets giving many “charitable” contributions to the schools and colleges controlling the curriculum, see Mirrell Land Bill – 1862. Rather than fixing the problem the numerous At-torn-eys holding public office(s) only serve to exacerbate the problem.
We’ve learned that anytime there’s a change in a law, that change has significant meaning. Especially when those changes involve nouns i.e. borders, towns, names, lines, time zones, (daylight savings) etc. Anytime they create a word set apart with its own definition we make note. For example, in the 50’s we had ‘hi-ways” (high-ways) but by the mid 60’s we were calling them ‘free-ways’. Soon the common language will be ‘corridors’. You’ll realize this word is used in terms of ‘international commerce’. Watch for the name “Canamex” or do an ‘engine search’ on that term. These ‘corridors’ are currently facilitating international commerce running from Canada through the United States into Mexico thanks to NAFTA and GATT. It’s a one world government whether or not we want to acknowledge it!

We don’t have a lot of time to do these things either. When looking at the sunset clauses of the IRC we find it’s going to become more difficult in the future to advance the remedy Congress has prescribed. Lining up, listing, and identifying our lineage is of the utmost importance. Where do you come from? Where’s your home? What’s the source to your income? How did you arrive at these asserted facts? Where’s your worksheet? Again I reiterate, I can’t do your work for you! I’ve got roughly 80 gigs of information in the computer h.d. I’ve got another room full of books, files, printings, and cabinets loaded with material. I’m not saying you must do likewise, but there’s got to be a ‘certain’ passion for acquiring the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. For it’s only within this passion that one will be capable of understanding the truth when revealed. Otherwise it will be as Jack Nicholson once said, “you can’t handle the truth!”

Regarding what most others are doing and what we’re doing is no comparison. There may be similarities within the separate approaches, but usually they’re telling me how to fill out a form, what to write on the form and who to send it to. I’m not telling the IRS anything but merely making a “Request for Innocent Spouse Relief”. I’ll explain more about this in later posts but for now I want to focus on who we are and where we came from.
There’s an order to things divinely inspired the most perfect of which is the marriage union. NRS 1.030  Application of common law in courts.  The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or the Constitution and laws of this State, shall be the rule of decision in all the courts of this State. [1911 CPA § 532; RL § 5474; NCL § 9021] Regardless of any recognition given to the existence of a family trust estate we must understand that whenever additions (marriage, adoptions, and births) or subtractions (deaths) take place there’s a transfer of interest (interest in property is a property ––26§2056A) within that family. Here we’re talking about exercising a power over property that’s within the interior boundaries of a particular territorial jurisdiction. This government has been instituted among men to afford these men with the blessings of liberty and only through our genealogy [chain of title] do we identify ourselves as members of that [certain] posterity. Unbeknown to the general society we have a [reversionary interest] in those converted properties. Fifty percent of that interest lies within our father’s DNA and his surname with the other fifty percent derived through our mother and her dower interests in grandma’s estate.

Because women couldn’t vote or hold public office they held an interest in the affairs of the e-state known as [“preferred stock”]. Another absolute must is acknowledging that the Internal Revenue Code is written in compliance to the Constitution. It’s simply not the fault of Congress we fail to realize that we’re beneficiaries and that the real power lies within each of us. God says, (Hosea 4:6) “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” KJV

The word ‘posterity’ is ‘certain’. There should arise no difficulty understanding the definition given to that word. It simply means future generations, future descendents i.e. children and grandchildren. The surety barrens writ in perpetuity is not being honored today. Remember the Alamo, I mean the Magna Charta? http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/index2.htm
In the posts that follow we will discuss the importance of estates, our resolve within an opportunity to make change, and the command we truly hold over life itself. Others will include trust instruments, grantors, and the Power over property.
Perhaps these sought after reversions benefit us but the foremost purpose underlying our actions is the same as our grandparents, i.e. to benefit the children. If not for the people there’d be no estates and without estates there’d be no state. Thus, it is on our children’s behalf we act today.

I leave you with this thought: Gal. 3: 16The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. The Scripture does not say "and to seeds," meaning many people, but "and to your seed,"[g] meaning one person, who is Christ. 17What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. 18For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on a promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise.

 19What, then, was the purpose of the law? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come. The law was put into effect through angels by a mediator. 20A mediator, however, does not represent just one party; but God is one.

 21Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law. 22But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.

 23Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. 24So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ[h] that we might be justified by faith. 25Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law.

 26You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, 27for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. (NIV)

IN THE BEGINNING

Lesson 1:2


John 1: 1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He [the Word] was with God in the beginning.  3Through him [the Word] all things were made; without him [the Word] nothing was made that has been made. 4In him [the Word] was life, and that life was the light of men. 5The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it… 14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

One way of gathering whether others are on the right path is reading their verbiage. Perhaps some have been influenced by “scammers” and consultants but regardless of whether ‘right or wrong’ those actions demonstrate an [intent to sever] as found in Chap 80 of the IRC. [fn1] These same severability clause(s) are found in every state’s statutes as well. (more on this topic in Lesson 3:1 Qualified Hier) If I’ve tried to make one point it’s this: we’re acting on behalf of grandma and her dower. She’s been cheated by the numerous alterations to that original expressed intent. It’s her dower that’s been stolen. Do you understand “dower” and “curtesy” and that a ‘use’ is a ‘trust’? The answer must be ‘yes’ to continue. Please read following C.J.S. post re; Estate, Curtesy, and Trust.

We know that the tax is imposed as an ‘indirect’ excise tax, right? Logic would then dictate this imposition is to be found under the ‘Sales and Use’ taxes, would it not? Can you answer why a ‘use’ is also considered a trust? Answer: Because people could will to their heirs certain tracts of land for their use for life. We, by birth, have acquired that same gift, a life estate in a tract of land that we call state, originally e-state – a possession belonging to the people. Additionally we’ve got life estates within that state, or whichever state we’re born in, a birthright within which is our entitlement to citizenship.
Just because women couldn’t vote didn’t leave them powerless. What happened when widowed? Or worse, the husband dies intestate (without a will)? Hopefully you’ve realized that under the original intent of our grantor grandfather’s men maintained [power and control] over the estate [in its entirety]. The reason this intent is not being properly exercised today is because it’s been altered. On August 18, 1920 everything changed. Listen, because of these distortions we (you and I as direct lineal descendents) possess a certain [reversionary interest] through our great, great, great, (Revolutionary War) grandfather. And don’t let anyone fool you, these reversionary interests encompass far more than mere [incorporeal hereditaments]. The state is a fiction but my family is real.

Many today fail to realize that the federal government can’t hurt us, touch us, or incarcerate us. These torts are perpetrated by [human beings] [employed] by a fictional property. Government itself is nothing more than a creature of statute with every action committed to paper. I might add, this fiction is indeed an intangible property belonging to the people, rather than a power unto itself as some would otherwise perceive. Nevertheless, the direct lineal descendents possess the [certain] interest(s) delegating its authority. It’s simply not the fault of Congress we don’t know who we are.

There are several prerequisites to the creation of an express-trust. Do you know what they are? Did you know there are numerous kinds of trusts? The catch here is we’ve got to have a competent settler. The men gathering from the farms, towns, and cities, for the purpose of drafting the Constitution, were not dumb by the least of standards. They were deemed [competent settlers]. Now we must ask ourselves, is there [sufficient amount of trust property]? What is a [trust property]?
Many today possess a misplaced reliance in the ‘Treaty of Peace’ as they’re simply ignorant of its true purpose. My studies dictate it was a strict agreement between the United States of America and England not to interfere with the other’s commerce. Even today everything evolves around commerce. Regardless of a monetary value every transaction is commerce. Right now I’m selling you a [bill of goods] and you’re [buying] it. Those political systems, in selling us a bill of goods, didn’t limit us to a simple [pledge of support – oath - bond] but they got us to contribute to the [presidential election campaign fund]. Do we not today exhibit a compared honor to that which was sacrificed in our grantor grandfather’s generation?
Do you understand the term ‘grantor grandfather’? Do you understand that it’s through him we’ve been given this gift? By their pledge they granted the gift of a constitution, for whose benefit? (You should be able to answer this by now.) Hint: “preamble”. Here’s a warmer clue: [direct lineal descendent]. Actually I’m looking for the word “posterity”.

Let’s hypothesize for the moment and say one has just been [naturalized]. Under the qualifications of the president it says that a person shall be a natural born citizen or a citizen of the United States. If one immigrates through Ellis Island can s/he adopt the Constitution? Doesn’t one have a choice? Of course we do, but the governmental employees remain quiet. They instead demand we sign this or that form declaring our residency and allegiance.

John Locke, in §59 of his essay concerning the origin, extent and end to civil government, asks, ‘when is a man mature?’ What gives him a free disposition of his property according to his will? He then proceeds to explain the importance of maturity. I believe contained within this maturity lies our desire for knowledge.
We’ve got to keep in mind when reading the code, when Congress mentions a ‘stock’ or an interest in ‘stock’ we are a shareholder in an S partnership under a C corporation that is tiered with many ‘S’ partnership or corporation. The 1040 form didn’t arrive on the scene until 1913 with the passage of the 16th amendment and the Federal Reserve Act. But this wasn’t good enough for the banksters. They had to get the women involved! The men and women of that time had no choice in the matter. This new tax was imposed against them regardless of any consideration given to ‘constitutionality’. (See CFR 1.1346-1)

Just before section 1, after the ‘Table of Code Sections” are the definitions given to the Subtitles and chapters. Within Subtitle A are listed 6 chapters of which is number 6—Consolidated returns. You will notice of all the chapters listed within Subtitle A, number six is the only required return, and it’s by corporations. Well, guess what? You are the shareholder in a foreign corporation created by a U.S. PERSON. (caps for appellation) We already know 26§7701(a) defines this person as a trust, right? At the time the Constitution was ratified there wasn’t a distinction given to a difference between “U.S. citizen”, “American” or ‘state citizen’. These alterations came much later. It’s through these tricks of terms coupled with the gullibility of society the banksters were enabled with a power to deceive. But again I say, if my actions maintain and/or advance a fraud I have no one to blame but myself. Ignorance is not bliss! Even so, we can not exercise a power that is contrary to the grantor’s wish; that would be [self-dealing]. The original grantor grandfathers did not agree to barrow money for less than an adequate consideration of money or money’s worth, would you? It’s obvious why they didn’t agree to exchange any other currency outside of gold and silver.

Here’s another important tidbit; at the drafting of the Constitution women and slaves were considered ‘property’. Both were exchanged albeit slaves were sold, bought, traded, auctioned, and even mortgaged. Women, on the other hand, were exchanged with the dower in mind. (Still in practice today) Both were property then just as all are property today. The question ultimately boils down to this: Who owns title to your property?
Listen, our title belongs to our grandfather. Is he not the grantor of our surname? Within his bond, his pledge, his sacrifice lies our freedom and it’s through him we possess a meager [interest in property]. It’s on grandpa’s behalf we act today; to benefit our grandchildren tomorrow. Nonetheless, the United States is acting on his behalf as well. Furthermore, the United States is acting on behalf of every one of grandpa’s heirs. How many are alive today? How many have you found in the cemeteries? Perhaps in utilizing an [increased Research Credit] we’ll find more. Each of those victims need a representative to set the record straight.
P.L. 93-549 – Get it, read it, and be not afraid!
Footnote 1.

26§ 7852. Other applicable rules



  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   17
:)


The database is protected by copyright ©hestories.info 2017
send message

    Main page

:)