Discourse and Coherence



Download 246.73 Kb.
Page2/4
Date conversion12.06.2018
Size246.73 Kb.
1   2   3   4
Escoriza Morera, L. (2000). El discurso político en el marco del análisis del discurso: mecanismos de cohesión y coherencia. Lengua, discurso, texto: I simposio internacional de análisis del discurso. In: José Jesús de Bustos Tovar (Ed.), . (pp. 2277-2286).

Estévez Flores, M. M. (2002). La estructuración del discurso político: la coherencia textual. In: Politica y oratoria: el lenguaje de los políticos. (pp. 39-44).
Estévez Flores, M. M. (2002). La estructuración del discurso político: la coherencia textual. In: Politica y oratoria: el lenguaje de los políticos. (pp. 39-44). Cádiz: Fundación Municipal de Cultura del Ayuntamiento de Cádiz: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz.
Evans, D. A., & Gadd, C. S. (1989). Managing coherence and context in medical problem-solving discourse. In David A. Evans, & Vimla L. Patel (Eds.), Cognitive science in medicine: Biomedical modeling. (pp. 211-255). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. (2011). Discovering domains - On the acquisition of causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1645-1662.
Fabricius-Hansen, C. (2005). Elusive connectives. A case study on the explicitness dimension of discourse coherence. Linguistics, 43(1), 17-48.
Fall, K., Lapointe, F., & Vignaux, G. (1993). Coherence discursive et trajectoire cognitive: a propos d'argumentations en milieu scolairee. (Discourse Coherence and Cognitive Trajectory: On Arguments in a School Setting). Revue quebecoise de linguistique theorique et appliquee, 11, 1-4, 173-206.
Fetzer, A. (2008). Theme zones in English media discourse: Forms and functions. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(9), 1543-1568.

Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In Jean-Francois Rouet, Jarmo J. Levonen, Andrew Dillon, & Rand J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition. (pp. 109-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Foltz, P. W. (2007). Discourse coherence and LSA. In: T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis. (pp. 167-184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The Measurement of Textual Coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 285-307.
Fontes, M. C. M. (1996). Review Article: Coherence in Psychotic Discourse; Resenha: Coherence in Psychotic Discourse. Revista de Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada (D.E.L.T.A.), 12(2), 379-386.
Foster, S. H. (1986). Learning discourse topic management in the preschool years. Journal of Child Language, 13(2), 231-250.
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2006). Ellipsis and discourse coherence (VP ellipsis). Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(3), 315-346.
Gaddy, M., Sung, Y., & Van den Broek, P. (2001). The influence of text cues on the allocation of attention during reading. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord & W. Spooren (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to text coherence (pg. 89-110). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Garcia, G. G. (1995). Effects of Text Coherence and English Language Proficiency on the Reading Comprehension of Fifth-Grade Students. Dissertation-Abstracts-International,-A:-The-Humanities-and-Social-Sciences; 1995, 55, 12, June, 3768-A.

García Jurado, F., & Maíz Arévalo, C. (2005). The idiomatic expression of incoherent discourse: 'can't make head nor tail': cognitive and contrastive analysis in Latin and English. Review of cognitive linguistics, 3, 117-131.

Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Referential Continuity and the Coherence of Discourse. Cognition, 11(1), 29-46.
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Referential discontinuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11, 29-46.
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. V., & Johnson Laird, P. N. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11 (1), 29-46.
Gericke, N. M., & Hagberg, M. (2010). Conceptual Incoherence as a Result of the use of Multiple Historical Models in School Textbooks. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 605-623.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.). (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givón, T. (Eds.) (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givon, T. (Eds.). (1995). Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Givón, T., & Symposium on Coherence in Spontaneous Text (Eds.). (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
Gibson, E., & Wolf, F. (2005). Representing Discourse Coherence: A Corpus-Based Study. Computational linguistics, 31(2), 249-287.
Gilyarevskii, R. S., & Subbotin, M. M. (1993). Russian Experience in Hypertext: Automatic Compiling of Coherent Texts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(4), 185-193.

Giora, R. (1997). Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(1), 17-34.

Giora, R. (1998). Discourse coherence is an independent notion: A reply to Deirdre Wilson. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(1), 75-86.
Giora, R., Meiran, N., & Oref, P. (1996). Identification of Written Discourse Topics by Structure Coherence and Analogy Strategies: General-Aspects and Individual-Differences. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), 455-474.
Givón, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. (pp. 175-188). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Givón, T. (1993). Coherence in text, coherence in mind. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1, 171-227.
Givón, T. (1995). Coherence in Text vs. Coherence in Mind. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 59-115). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Givón, T. (Ed.). (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
Godoy, A. V. (2010). Integration of students with special educational needs: ¿Does coherence exist between the discourses and pedagogic practices exercised by primary teachers? . Integración de alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales: ¿Existe coherencia entre el discursEstudios Pedagogicos, 35(2), 189-202.
Golding, J. M., Millis, K. M., Hauselt, J., & Sego, S. A. (1995). The effect of connectives and causal relatedness on text comprehension. In Robert Frederick Lorch, & Edward J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading. (pp. 127-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., & van den Broek, P. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldman, S. R., Van den Broek, P. W., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence. Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goldman, S. R.,Van den Broek, P. W., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1999). Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Golebiowski, Z. (2006). The distribution of discoursal salience in research papers: Relational hypotaxis and parataxis. Discourse Studies, 8(2), 259-278.
Gonzalez, M. (2005). Pragmatic markers and discourse coherence relations in English and Catalan oral narrative. Discourse Studies, 7(1), 53-86.
Gonzalez, M. D. G. (2010). Evaluating lexical cohesion in telephone conversations. Discourse Studies, 12(5), 599-623.
Gonzalez, M. D. G. (2011). Lexical cohesion in multiparty conversations. Language Sciences, 33(1), 167-179.
Gonzalez, M. D. G. (2011). Lexical cohesion in multiparty conversations. Language Sciences, 33(1), 167-179.
González Pérez, R. (2006). Coherencia textual y tipos de discurso: sobre la polivalencia semántica de los signos lingüísticos en el discurso político. In: Manuel Casado Velarde, Ramón González Ruiz, & María Victoria Romero Gualda (Eds.), Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores: Actas del I Congreso Internacional. (pp. 505-520).
Goodin, G., & Perkins, K. (1982). Discourse Analysis and the Art of Coherence. College English, 44(1), 57-63.

Goodwin, C. (1995). The Negotiation of Coherence within Conversation. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 117-137). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Gordon, P. C., & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 (2), 216-231.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17 (3), 311-347.
Gordon, P. C., & Scearce, K. A. (1995). Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Memory and Cognition, 23 (3), 313-323.
Gough, V., & Talbot, M. (1996). 'Guilt over Games Boys Play': Coherence as a Focus for Examining the Constitution of Heterosexual Subjectivity on a Problem Page. In Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa, & Coulthard, Malcolm (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. (pp. 214-230). London, England: Routledge.
Grabski, M., & Stede, M. (2006). Bei: Intraclausal coherence relations illustrated with a German preposition. Discourse Processes, 41(2), 195-219.
Graesser, A. C., Bertus, E. L., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In Robert Frederick Lorch, & Edward J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading. (pp. 295-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser, A. C., Bertus, E. L., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In: R. F. J. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading. (pp. 295-320). Hillsdale, NJ,England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. Q. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 193-202.
Graesser,A. C., McNamara,D. S.,& Louwerse,M. M (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A. P. Sweet and C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82-98). New York: Guilford Publications.
Greciano, G. (1994). Phraseologische Text(in)koharenz. Cahiers d'Etudes Germaniques, 27, 93-103.
Greenfield, P. M., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2003). Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24 (6), 713-738.
Grenoble, L., & Riley, M. (1996). The Role of Deictics in Discourse Coherence: French voici/voila and Russian vot/von. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(6), 819-838.
Groen, M., Noyes, J., & Verstraten, F. (2010). The Effect of Substituting Discourse Markers on Their Role in Dialogue. Discourse Processes, 47(5), 388-420.
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203-225.
Grosz, B. J., Weinstein, S., & Joshi, A. K. (1995). Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203-225.
Guardiola, D. (2002). Del texto claro al discurso coherente: algunas consideraciones sobre la labor dinámica de un editor. Comunicación y sociedad: Revista de la Facultad de Comunicación, 15(2), 55-77.

Gurlitt, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 407-419.

Gutierrezclellen, V. F., & Iglesias, A. (1992). Causal Coherence in the Oral Narratives of Spanish-Speaking Children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35(2), 363-372.
Haberlandt, K., & Bingham, G. (1978). Verbs Contribute to the Coherence of Brief Narratives: Reading Related and Unrelated Sentence Triples. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 419-425.
Hachim Lara, L. (2006). ¿Por qué volver a los textos coloniales?: herencias y coherencias del pensamiento americano en el discurso colonial. Literatura y lingüística, 17, 15-28.
Haft-van Rees, M. A. (1987). Van opeenvolgingsregels tot bijeenbehorende paren: de samenhang tussen taaluitingen in gesprekken. (From Sequencing Rules to Adjacency Pairs: On the Coherence between Utterances in Conversation). TTT, 7(4), 239-256.
Hakala, C. M., & O'Brien, E. J. (1995). Strategies for Resolving Coherence Breaks in Reading. Discourse Processes, 20(2), 167-185.
Heydrich, W. (1989). Connexity and coherence: Analysis of text and discourse: edited by Wolfgang Heydrich.. (et al. Berlin New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Heydrich, W., Neubauer, F., Petoefi, J. S., & Soezer, E. (Eds.). (1989). Connexity and coherence: Analysis of text and discourse. Oxford: Walter De Gruyter
Heydrich, W., Neubauer, F., Petöfi, J. S., & Sözer, E. (Eds.). (1989). Connexity and Coherence: Analysis of Text and Discourse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Heydrich, W., & Universität Bielefeld. (Eds.). (1989). Connexity and coherence. Analysis of text and discourse. Berlin New York: W. de Gruyter.

Heyman, R. D. (1986). Formulating topic in the classroom. Discourse Processes, 9 (1), 37-55.

Heyman, R. D. (1986). Formulating topic in the classroom. Discourse Processes, 9(1), 37-55.
Hickok, G., Wilson, M., Clark, K., Klima, E. S., Kritchevsky, M., & Bellugi, U. (1999). Discourse deficits following right hemisphere damage in deaf signers. Brain & Language, 66(2), 233-248.
Hidalgo Downing, L. (2004). Discourse, Culture and Cognition: The Role of Negation in the Creation of Coherence in Press and Advertising Discourse. Revista canaria de estudios ingleses, 49, 87-102.
Hobbs, J. R. (1978). Coherence in English Discourse'', Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bergen, Norway, August 1978.
Hobbs, J. R. (1978). Why is Discourse Coherent?'' SRI Technical Note 176, SRI International, Menlo Park, California. November 1978. Also in Fritz Neubauer, Ed., Coherence in Natural-Language Texts, pp. 29-69. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag. 1983.
Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and Coreference. Cognitive Science, 3(1), 67-90.
Hobbs, J. R. (1982). Towards an Understanding of Coherence in Discourse'', in Strategies for Natural-Language Processing, W. Lehnert and M. Ringle, editors, pp. 223-244, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Inc., Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse'', Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. (208KB)]
Hobbs, J. R. (2010). Clause-Internal Coherence, in P. Kühnlein, A. Benz, & C. Sidner (eds.), Constraints in Discourse 2, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 15-34

Hobbs, J. R., & Agar, M. (1985) The Coherence of Incoherent Discourse'', Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 4, nos. 3-4, pp. 213-232.

Hobbs, J. R., & Agar, M. H. (1985). The coherence of incoherent discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4 (3-4), 213-232.
Hodel, R. (2004). Sigitas Geda - Metaphoricaness as a principle of text coherence in the poem "Strazdas". Journal of Baltic Studies, 35(1), 63-81.
Hough, M. S., & Barrow, I. (2003). Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 17 (2), 183-191.
House, J. (2009). Subjectivity in English as Lingua Franca discourse: The case of you know. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(2), 171-193.
Hu, Z. (1994). Yu pian di xian jie yu lian guan = Discourse cohesion and coherence. Shanghai: Shanghai wai yu jiao yu chu ban she.
Hutchens, S. A. (1999). Maintaining text coherence during reading.(comprehension).
Hyvärinen, M. (Ed.). (2010). Beyond narrative coherence. Philadelphia, Pa.: John Benjamins Pub. Company.
Incikabi, L. (2011). The coherence of the curriculum, textbooks and placement examinations in geometry education: How reform in Turkey brings balance to the classroom. Education as Change, 15(2), 239-255.
Innes, B. (2010). "Well, that's why I asked the question sir": Well as a discourse marker in court. Language in Society, 39(1), 95-117.
Israelite, N. K., & Helfrich, M. A. (1988). Improving text coherence in basal readers: Effects of revisions on the comprehension of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing readers. Volta Review, 90(6), 261-276.

Jacobs, S., Jackson, S., Stearns, S., & Hall, B. (1991). Digressions in argumentative discourse: Multiple goals, standing concerns, and implicatures. In: Tracy, Karen. (Ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction:Issues linking goals and discourse. Communication textbook series:Language and discourse processes. (pp. 43-61). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. vi, 212 p

Jaubert, A., & Biraud, M. (2005). Cohésion et cohérence. Études de linguistique textuelle. Lyon: ENS éditions.
Jonz, J. (Ed.). (1994). Cloze and coherence. Lewisburg (Pa. London Cranbury, NJ: Bucknell University Press Associated University Presses.
Kaakinen, J. K., Salonen, J., Venalainen, P., & Hyona, J. (2011). Influence of text cohesion on the persuasive power of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52(3), 201-208.
Kaiser, E. (2010). Effects of Contrast on Referential Form: Investigating the Distinction Between Strong and Weak Pronouns. Discourse Processes, 47(6), 480-509.
Kaiser, E. (2011). Salience and contrast effects in reference resolution: The interpretation of Dutch pronouns and demonstratives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1587-1624.
Kamalski, J., Lentz, L., Sanders, T., & Zwaan, R. (2008). The Forewarning Effect of Coherence Markers in Persuasive Discourse: Evidence From Persuasion and Processing. Discourse Processes, 45(6), 545-579.
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45 (4-5), 323-345.
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence marking, prior knowledge, and comprehension of informative and persuasive texts: Sorting things out. Discourse Processes, 45(4-5), 323-345.
Kamas, E., & Reder, L. M. (1993). The role of familiarity in cognitive processing. In O'Brien, J., & Lorch, R. (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension. A festschrift in honor of Jerome L. Myers. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kang, J. Y. (2004). Telling a coherent story in a foreign language: analysis of Korean EFL learners' referential strategies in oral narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(11), 1975-1990.

Kang, J. Y. (2004). Telling a coherent story in a foreign language: analysis of Korean EFL learners¿ referential strategies in oral narrative discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 36(11), 1975-1990.
Kantz, M. J. (1989). Promises of coherence, weak content, and strong organization: An analysis of the student texts. Berkeley, CA Pittsburgh, PA: University of California Carnegie Mellon University.
Kantz, M. J. (1990). Promises of coherence, weak content, and strong organization: An analysis of the students' texts. In Linda Flower, Victoria Stein, John Ackerman, Margaret J. Kantz, Kathleen McCormick, & Wayne C. Peck (Eds.), Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. Social and cognitive studies in writing and literacy. (pp. 76-95). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Karoly, K. (2010). Shifts in repetition vs. shifts in text meaning A study of the textual role of lexical repetition in non-literary translation. Target-International Journal of Translation Studies, 22(1), 40-70.
Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Kehler, A. (2004). Discourse topics, sentence topics, and coherence. Theoretical Linguistics, 30(2-3), 227-240.
Khemlani, S. S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2012). Hidden conflicts: Explanations make inconsistencies harder to detect. Acta Psychologica, 139(3), 486-491.
Kibble, R., & Power, R. (2004). Optimizing referential coherence in text generation. Computational Linguistics, 30(4), 401-416.

Kimmel, M. (2010). Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 97-115.

Kincaid, J. R. (1977). Coherent Readers, Incoherent Texts. Critical Inquiry, 3(4), 781-802.
Kindt, W., & DFG-Forschergruppe "Kohärenz" Gemeinschaftspublikation (1991). In G. Rickheit (Ed.): Kohärenzprozesse. Modellierung von Kohärenz in Texten und Diskursen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Kinginger, C. (1997). A discourse approach to the study of language educator''s coherence systems. Modern language journal, 81(1), 6-14.
Kinginger, C. (1997). A Discourse Approach to the Study of Language Educators Coherence Systems. Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 6-14.
Kintsch, W. (1995). How Readers Construct Situation Models for Stories: The Role of Syntactic Cues and Causal Inferences. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 139-160). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Kintsch, W., & Franzke, M. (1994). The role of background knowledge in the recall of a news story. In R. Lorch, & E. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources ·of coherence in text comprehension. (pp. 321-333). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.
Klaiber, I. (2011). Multiple Implied Authors: How Many Can a Single Text Have?. Style, 45(1), 138-+.
Kleifgen, J. A., & Savilletroike, M. (1992). Achieving Coherence in Multilingual Interaction. Discourse Processes, 15(2), 183-206.
Klein, S., & Simmons, R. F. (1963). Syntactic Dependence and the Computer Generation of Coherent Discourse. Mechanical Translation, 7(2).

Klettke, B., & Graesser, A. C. (2000). Coherence and evidence in testimony evaluation on incest narratives. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meetings of the Society for Text and Discourse (pp154-155). Lyon, France.

Klettke, B., Graesser, A. C., & Powell, M. B. (2010). Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: The Effects of Evidence, Coherence and Credentials on Juror Decision Making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 481-494.
Knott, A. (2001). Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. In: Sanders, Ted, Schilperoord, Joost, & Spooren, Wilbert (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam,Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Knott, A., & Dale, R. (1994). Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18(1), 35-62.
Knott, A., Oberlander, J., O'Donnell, M., & Mellish, C. (2001). Beyond elaboration: The interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In: Sanders, Ted, Schilperoord, Joost, & Spooren, Wilbert (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam,Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Knott, A., & Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(2), 135-175.
Koch, I. G. V. (1997). O texto e a construção dos sentidos. (The text and the construction of meanings). São Paulo: Contexto.
Koch, I. V., & Travaglia, L. C. (1989). Texto e Coerência. São Paulo: Cortez.




1   2   3   4


The database is protected by copyright ©hestories.info 2017
send message

    Main page