Discourse and Coherence



Download 246.73 Kb.
Page4/4
Date conversion12.06.2018
Size246.73 Kb.
1   2   3   4
Ribeiro, B. M. T. (1990). Coherence in Psychotic Discourse: Frame and Topic (Volumes I and Ii). Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 50(7), 2039-1.

Ribeiro, B. T. (1993). Framing in psychotic discourse. In: D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse. (pp. 77-113). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Ribeiro, B. T. (1994). Coherence in psychotic discourse. London: Oxford University Press
Ribeiro, B. T. (1994). Coherence in psychotic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rickheit, G. (Ed.). (1995). Focus and coherence in discourse processing. Berlin New York: W. de Gruyer.
Rickheit, G., & Habel, C. (Eds.). (1995). Focus and coherence in discourse processing. Berlin New York: W. de Gruyer.
Riley, J. A. (2007). Mental representations: Reference and definiteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(5), 831-871.
Riley, P. (1980). When Communication Breaks Down: Levels of Coherence in Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 201-216.
Ripich, D. N., & Terrell, B. Y. (1988). Patterns of Discourse Cohesion and Coherence in Alzheimers-Disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53(1), 8-15.
Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1993). Nonstandard Discourse and Its Coherence. Discourse Processes, 16(4), 451-464.
Rocci, A. (2005). Are manipulative texts 'coherent'? Manipulation, presuppositions and (in-)congruity. In: L. de Saussure, & P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and ideologies in the twentieth century: Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture. (pp. 85-112). Amsterdam,Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Rogalski, Y., Altmann, L. J. P., Plummer-D'Amato, P., Behrman, A. L., & Marsiske, M. (2010). Discourse coherence and cognition after stroke: A dual task study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(3), 212-224.

Roji Menchaca, M. B. (1988). Subjectivity, coherence, context and style on the comprehension of a complex discourse / Subjetividad, coherencia, contexto y estilo en la comprension de un discurso complejo. Estudios de Psicologia, 33-34, 53-68.
Roji Menchaca, M. B. (1988). Subjetividad, coherencia, contexto y estilo en la comprension de un discurso complejo. /Subjectivity, coherence, context and style on the comprehension of a complex discourse. Estudios de Psicologia, 33-34, 53-68.
Romera, M. (2004). Discourse functional units. The expression of coherence relations in spoken Spanish. Muenchen: LINCOM.
Roseman, J. E., Stern, L., & Koppal, M. (2010). A Method for Analyzing the Coherence of High School Biology Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 47-70.
Ross, G. (1987). Coherence Theory: An Interdisciplinary Study. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 47, 12, 4378-3.
Rottman, B. M., & Keil, F. C. (2011). What matters in scientific explanations: Effects of elaboration and content. Cognition, 121(3), 324-337.
Roventa-Frumusani, D. (1984). Remarques sur la coherence dans le discours scientifique. (Remarks on Coherence in Scientific Discourse). Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 29(2), 149-158.
Samet, J., & Schank, R. (1984). Coherence and Connectivity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7(1), 57-82.
Sanchez, E., & Garcia, J. R. (2009). The relation of knowledge of textual integration devices to expository text comprehension under different assessment conditions. Reading and Writing, 22(9), 1081-1108.

Sanders, J., Sanders, T., & Sweetser, E. (2012). Responsible subjects and discourse causality. How mental spaces and perspective help identifying subjectivity in Dutch backward causal connectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(2), 191-213.

Sanders, R. E. (1983). Tools for cohering discourse and their strategic utilization: Markers of structural connections and meaning relations. In R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy. (pp. 67-80). Beverly
Sanders, T. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes, 24(1), 119-147.
Sanders, T., Land, J., & Mulder, G. (2007). Linguistic markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts. Information Design Journal, 15 (3), 219-235.
Sanders, T., & Spooren, W. (2001). Text representation as an interface between language and its users. In: Sanders, Ted, Schilperoord, Joost, & Spooren, Wilbert (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam,Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sanders, T. J. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29 (1), 37-60.
Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 15(1), 1-35.
Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1993). Coherence Relations in a Cognitive Theory of Discourse Representation. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), 93-133.
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1994). Selective processing in text understanding. In: Gernsbacher, Morton Ann. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. (pp. 699-719). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Sanford, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (1995). Aspects of Coherence in Written Language: A Psychological Perspective. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 161-187). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Sanjose, V., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Padilla, O. M. (2006). A connectionist extension to Kintsch's Construction-Integration model. Discourse Processes, 42(1), 1-35.
Sawyer, K. (2003). Coherence in Discourse: Suggestions for Future Work. Human Development, 46 (4), 189-193.
Scheppers, F. (2003). P(ragmatic)-trees. Coherence, intentionality and cognitive content in discourse and non-verbal action. Journal of pragmatics, 35(5), 665-694.
Scheppers, F. (2003). P(Ragmatic)-Trees: Coherence, Intentionality and Cognitive Content in Discourse and Nonverbal Action. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 665-694.
Schiffrin, D. (1985). Conversational Coherence: The Role of Well. Language, 61(3), 640-667.
Schifko, P. (1992). La coherencia de textos: un problema semántico y pragmático. In: Ramón Lorenzo Vázquez (Ed.), Actas do XIX Congreso Internacional de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas. (pp. 419-426). .
Schlatter, T., & Kasermann, M. L. (1991). Koharenz als Interaktionsphanomen. Ergebnisse einer Einzelfallstudie. (Coherence as a Phenomenon of Interaction: Results of a Case Study). Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie, Psychopathologie, und Psychotherapie, 39(1), 88-97.
Schnitzer, J. (1994). Relaciones de coherencia entre texto verbal e imagen en pintadas politicas. Supostavitelno Ezikoznanie Sopostavitel'noe Jazykoznanie Contrastive Linguistics, 19(1), 35-45.
Schnotz, W. (1994). Aufbau von Wissensstrukturen. Untersuchungen zur Kohärenzbildung beim Wissenserwerb mit Texten. Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologie-Verlag-Union.

Schramm, A. H. (1999). Aspect and causal inferences: The role of temporal coherence in a process model of inference generation in text comprehension.

Schroeder, S., Richter, T., McElvany, N., Hachfeld, A., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., Horz, H., & Ullrich, M. (2011). Teachers' beliefs, instructional behaviors, and students' engagement in learning from texts with instructional pictures. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 403-415.
Sgall, P. (1983). On one aspect of textual coherence. In F. Neubauer (Ed.). Coherence in natural-language texts. (pp. 135-143). Hamburg: Buske.
Shakir, A. (1991). Aspects of Cohesion and Coherence in AFL Student-written Texts Al-carabiyya, 25, 201-221.
Shakir, A. (1991). Coherence in EFL Student-Written Texts: Two Perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 399-411.
Shakir, A. (1992). Gulf War Jokes: Cohesion and Coherence. Text, 12(1), 447-468.
Shakir, A., & Farghal, M. (1992). Gulf War Jokes: Cohesion and Coherence. Text, 12(3), 447-468.
Shapiro, A. M. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 29-44.
Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1997). Coherence and cohesion in children's stories. In: Costermans, Jean, & Fayol, Michel (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, NJ,England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Shen, Y., & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical (in) coherence in discourse. Discourse Processes, 28 (2), 139-153.
Shen, Y., & Balaban, N. (1999). Metaphorical (in)Coherence in Discourse. Discourse Processes, 28(2), 139-153.

Simon, J. A., Keenan, J. M., Pennington, B. F., Taylor, A. K., & Hagerman, R. J. (2001). Discourse processing in women with fragile X syndrome: Evidence for a deficit establishing coherence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18 (1), 1-18.

Sinatra, G. M., Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1993). How knowledge influenced two interventions designed to improve comprehension. Reading Psychology, 14 (2), 141-163.
Singer, M. (1980). The Role of Case-Filling Inferences in the Coherence of Brief Passages. Discourse Processes, 3(3), 185-201.
Singer, M., & Gagnon, N. (1999). Detecting causal inconsistencies in scientific text. In: S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. (pp. 179-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
Slife, B. D. (2000). Are discourse communities incommensurable in a fragmented psychology? The possibility of disciplinary coherence. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21 (3), 261-272.
Smith, R., Heuerman, M., Wilson, B. M., & Proctor, A. (2003). Analysis of normal discourse patterns. Brain and Cognition, 53 (2), 368-371.
Solomon, O. (2004). Narrative introductions: discourse competence of children with autistic spectrum disorders. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 253-276.
Sözer, E. (Ed.). (1985). Text connexity, text coherence. Aspects, methods, results. Hamburg: H. Buske Verlag.
Spenader, J., Smits, E. J., & Hendriks, P. (2009). Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Journal of Child Language, 36 (1), 23-52.
Spenader, J., Smits, E. J., & Hendriks, P. (2009). Coherent discourse solves the pronoun interpretation problem. Journal of Child Language, 36(1), 23-52.

Spiegel, D. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1990). Textual Cohesion and Coherence in Childrens Writing Revisited. Research in the Teaching of English, 24(1), 48-66.

Spooren, W. (1997). The Processing of Underspecified Coherence Relations. Discourse Processes, 24(1), 149-168.
Spooren, W. (2001). Causal connectives have presuppositions: Effects on coherence and discourse structure - Luuk Lagerwerf, Doctoral dissertation. LOT (Netherlands graduate School of Linguistics) 10. The Hague: Holland Academic, 1998. pp. 253 p. ISBN 90-5569-53-8. Journal of pragmatics, 33(1), 137-141.
Spooren, W., & Sanders, T. (2008). The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(12), 2003-2026.
Stammerjohann, H. (1976). Koharenz und Delimitation: zur Struktur des Absatzes (am Beispiel von Camus' 'Le Mythe De Sisyphe'. (Coherence and Delimitation: on the Structure of the Paragraph (Based on 'Le Mythe de Sisyphe' (The Myth of Sisyphus) by Camus)). Folia Linguistica, 9, 1/4, 367-392.
Stein, N. L., & Albro, E. R. (1997). Building complexity and coherence: Children's use of goal-structured knowledge in telling stories. In: M. G. W. Bamberg (Ed.), Narrative development: Six approaches. (pp. 5-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
Stromer-Galley, J., & Martinson, A. M. (2009). Coherence in political computer-mediated communication: analyzing topic relevance and drift in chat. Discourse & Communication, 3(2), 195-216.
Stukker, N., Sanders, T., & Verhagen, A. (2008). Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives: Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(7), 1296-1322.

Stute, H. (1987). A ordem, a coerencia e a encenacao nas oracoes em gaviao. (Order, Coherence, and Performance in Gaviao Clauses). Serie Linguistica, 9(1), 71-103.

Sundermeier, B. A., Van den Broek, P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Causal coherence and the availability of locations and objects during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 462-470.
Swartz, S., & Swartz, L. (1987). Talk about talk: Metacommentary and context in the analysis of psychotic discourse. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 11 (4), 395-416.
Taboada, M. (2006). Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(4), 567-592.
Taboada, M., & Wiesemann, L. (2010). Subjects and topics in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(7), 1816-1828.
Talbot, M., & Gough, V. (1993). “Guilt over games boys play”: Coherence as a focus for examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page’. In Liverpool studies in language and discourse 1: 3-20.
Tannen, D. (1984). Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, N.J.: ABLEX Pub. Corp., c1984.
Tannen, D. (1990). Gender differences in topical coherence: Creating involvement in best friends' talk. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 73-90.
Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1984). Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Tanskanen, S. K. (2006). Collaborating towards coherence. Lexical cohesion in English discourse. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence: Toward a definition of comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Tapiero, I., & Otero, J. (2002). Situation models as retrieval structures: Effects on the global coherence of science texts. In: J. Otero, J. A. León & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension. (pp. 179-198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

Taraban, R. (2003). Understanding science texts requires coherent cognitive representations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17 (7), 879-880.
Terhorst, E. (1995). Textverstehen bei Kindern. Zur Entwicklung von Kohärenz und Referenz. Opladen: Westdt. Verlag.
Therriault, D. J., & Rinck, M. (2007). Multidimensional situation models. In: F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes. (pp. 311-327). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
Todaro, S., Millis, K., & Dandotkar, S. (2010). The Impact of Semantic and Causal Relatedness and Reading Skill on Standards of Coherence. Discourse Processes, 47(5), 421-446.
Todd, R. W. (2011). Analyzing discourse topics and topic keywords. Semiotica, 184(1-4), 251-270.
Tomlin, R. S. (1987). Coherence and grounding in discourse: Outcome of a symposium, Eugene, Oregon, June 1984. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Co.
Tomlin, R. S. (1987). Linguistic relections of cognitive events. In R.S. Tomlin, (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. (pp. 455-480). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tomlin, R. S. (Ed.). (1987). Coherence and grounding in discourse. Outcome of a symposium, Eugene, Oregon, June 1984. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.
Towns, S. N. (1986). The effects of two instructional approaches in the training of a strategy for organizing knowledge for a writing task.

Trabasso, T. (1991). The development of coherence in narratives by understanding intentional action. In: Denhiere, Guy, & Rossi, Jean-Pierre. (Eds.), Text and text processing. Advances in psychology, 79. (pp. 297-314). Oxford: North-Holland.

Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & Van den Broek, P. W. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp.83-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through online inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
Trabasso, T., Suh, S., & Payton, P. (1995). Explanatory Coherence in Understanding and Talking about Events. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 189-214). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Traxler, M. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Improving Coherence in Written Communication. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 215-237). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Tricás Preckler, M. (1997). Coherencia textual, argumentación y traducción. Diálogos hispánicos de Amsterdam, 20, 175-192.
Trnavac, R., & Taboada, M. (2012). The contribution of nonveridical rhetorical relations to evaluation in discourse. Language Sciences, 34(3), 301-318.
Tsui, A. B. M. (1991). Sequencing Rules and Coherence in Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(2), 111-129.
Tyler, A. (1992). Discourse Structure and the Perception of Incoherence in International Teaching Assistants' Spoken Discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 713-729.
Tyler, A. (1994). The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, 21 (6), 671-688.

Unger, C. (2006). Genre, relevance, and global coherence. The pragmatics of discourse type. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Urciuoli, B. (2010). Entextualizing diversity: Semiotic incoherence in institutional discourse. Language and Communication, 30(1), 48-57.
Valdes, G. (1986). Analyzing the demands that courtroom interaction makes upon speakers of ordinary English: Toward the development of a coherent descriptive framework. Discourse Processes, 9(3), 269-303.
Van Balkom, H. (1991). The communication of language impaired children: A study of discourse coherence in conversations of specific language impaired and normal language acquiring children with their primary caregivers. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger
Van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Pragmatic disability in children with specific language impairments. In: van Balkom, Hans., & Verhoeven, Ludo. (Eds.), Classification of developmental language disorders: Theoretical issues and clinical implications. (pp.283-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Van de Velde, R. G. (1986). On the foundations of interpretation: Explorations in the descriptive perspectives of inferential and coherential linguistics. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). London, England: Academic Press.
Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In Morton Ann Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. (pp. 539-588). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Van den Broek, P., & Gustafson, M. (1999). Comprehension and memory for texts: Three generations of reading research. In: S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. (pp. 15-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers

Van den Broek, P., & Gustafson, M. (1999). Comprehension and memory for texts: Three generations of research. In S.R. Goldman, A.C. Graesser, & P. Van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 15-34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartman, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch, Jr., & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Text Comprehension (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 353-373). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Functional Coherence in Discourse. Versus, 26-27, 49-65.
Van Leer, E., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The Effect of Elicitation Task on Discourse Coherence and Cohesion in Adolescents with Brain Injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32(5), 327-349.
Vauras, M., Hyona, J., & Niemi, P. (1992). Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: Evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 15(1), 39-54.
Vázquez Orta, I. (1993). Problems in the Characterisation of Coherence in Discourse Analysis. Sintagma: Revista de lingüística, 5, 37-48.
Velde, R. G. (1986). On the foundations of interpretation explorations in the descriptive perspectives of inferential and coherential linguistics. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.

Verdonik, D. (2010). Between understanding and misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(5), 1364-1379.

Vicente-Gomez, F. (1994). Semiotica de la significacion y retorica: Estructura semantica del texto y manifestacion elocutiva; Actas del III Seminario internacional del Inst. de Semiotica Lit. y Teatral, Madrid, UNED, 26-28 de abril, 1993. In C. J. Romera, A. Yllera, & P. M. Garcia (Eds.), Semiotica(s): Homenaje a Greimas. (pp. 319-26). Madrid: Visor.
Vidal-Abarca, E., Reyes, H., Gilabert, R., Calpe, J., Soria, E., & Greasser, A. C. (2000). ETAT: A tool to analyze expository text coherence. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meetings of the Society for Text and Discourse (pp 88-99). Lyon, France.
Vieiro Iglesias, P., & Gómez Veiga, I. (2000). Coherencia textual, conocimiento previo y comprensión. Revista galego-portuguesa de psicoloxía e educación: revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, 6.
Vivanco, V. (2005). The absence of connectives and the maintenance of coherence in publicity texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1233-1249.
Voss, J. F., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 215-243.
Wald, B. (1987). Cross-clause relations and temporal sequence in narrative and beyond. In R. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. (pp. 481-512). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wang, R. M., Mo, L., He, X. Y., Smythe, I., & Wang, S. P. (2010). Resolution of activated background information in text comprehension. International Journal of Psychology, 45(4), 241-249.

Wang, S. P., Chen, H. C., Yang, J. M., & Mo, L. (2008). Immediacy of integration in discourse comprehension: Evidence from Chinese readers' eye movements. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 241-257.

Wang, Y. F., & Tsai, P. H. (2005). Hao in spoken Chinese discourse: relevance and coherence. Language Sciences, 27(2), 215-243.
Watanabe, S. (2003). Cohesion and coherence strategies in paragraph-length and extended discourse in Japanese oral proficiency interviews. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 555-565.
Watanabe, S. (2003). Cohesion and Coherence Strategies in Paragraph-Length and Extended Discourse in Japanese Oral Proficiency Interviews: 15. Foreign language annals, 36(4).
Weck, G. (1991). La cohésion dans les textes d'enfants: étude du développement des processus anaphoriques. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Wegner, M. L., Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1984). Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and noncoherent discourse by aphasic and nonaphasic listeners. Brain and Language, 21 (1), 37-51.
Weltman, D., & Upchurch, M. (2010). The ideal of non-coherence in the World Bank's Social Capital reforms a textual analysis of "gratuitous complexity". Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 50-73.
Wenzel, F. (2005). Text coherence and narrative principle - Observations on the narrative song slogans taking the example of the "Wartburgkrieg" complex. Zeitschrift fur Deutsche Philologie, 124(3), 321-340.
Werth, P. (1984). FOCUS, COHERENCE, AND EMPHASIS. Pragmatics and Beyond, 5(2), 1-100.
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2011). Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 343-362.

Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1995). Coherence in Collaboration: Some Examples from Conversation. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann & Givon, T., (Eds.), Coherence in Spontaneous Text. (pp 239-267). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Wilkinson, F., & Wilson, H. R. (1998). Measurement of the Texture-Coherence Limit for Bandpass Arrays. Perception, 27(6), 711-728.
Wilson, B. M., & Proctor, A. (2002). Written discourse of adolescents with closed head injury. Brain Injury, 16 (11), 1011-1024.
Wilson, B. M., Smith, R., & Proctor, A. (2001). The validity of cognitive distance in oral and written discourse. Brain and Cognition, 46 (1-2), 304-307.
Wilson, D. (1998). Discourse, coherence and relevance: A reply to Rachel Giora. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(1), 57-74.
Wimmer, H., Wachter, J., & Hampl, E. (1978). Understanding the development of discourse: Observations concerning incoherencies. Zeitschrift fuer Entwicklungspsychologie und Paedagogische Psychologie, 10 (1), 49-51.
Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality. College Composition and Communication, 32(2), 189-204.
Wolf, F., & Gibson, E. (2005). Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based study. Computational Linguistics, 31(2), 249-287.
Wolf, F., & Gibson, E. (2006). Coherence in natural language. Data structures and applications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Wolf, F., Gibson, E., & Desmet, T. (2004). Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19 (6), 665-675.
Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2009). Manipulating task instructions to change narrative discourse performance. Aphasiology, 23(10), 1295-1308.

Wright, R. E., & Rosenberg, S. (1993). Knowledge of Text Coherence and Expository Writing: A Developmental-Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 152-158.

Yamada, K. (2009). Lexical patterns in L2 textual gist identification assessment. Language Testing, 26(1), 101-122.
Yamada, K. (2009). Lexical patterns in L2 textual gist identification assessment. Language Testing, 26(1), 101-122.
Yue, M., & Liu, H. T. (2011). Probability Distribution of Discourse Relations Based on a Chinese RST-annotated Corpus. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 18(2), 107-121.
Zabrucky, K. (1986). The role of factual coherence in discourse comprehension. Discourse Processes, 9 (2), 197-220.
Zabrucky, K., & Commander, N. E. (1993). Rereading to understand: The role of text coherence and reader proficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(4), 442-454.
Ziff, P. (1984). Coherence. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7(1), 31-42.
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In: Goldman, Susan R., Graesser, Arthur C., & van den Broek, Paul (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.




1   2   3   4


The database is protected by copyright ©hestories.info 2017
send message

    Main page