Food, agriculture and fisheries, and biotechnology teampest project



Download 0.54 Mb.
Page5/9
Date conversion03.05.2018
Size0.54 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9

Figure 26. A contour of U.S. pesticide policy

Source: Author, 2008.



Furthermore the new regulations made it easier to register public-health pesticides (i.e., those used to protect the public from diseases carried by insects or animals) and pesticides used on minor crops including many fruit and vegetable crops. The new Act defines minor use as the use of a pesticide on an animal or on a commercial crop/site if the crop is grown on less than 300,000 U.S. acres. The new law intends to improve consumers’ access to information on pesticide exposure by authorizing the EPA to provide a list of substitute foods for higher risk products and distribute it to the supermarkets. Additionally, it considers the risks from pesticide residues to infants and children. According to the law, research should be undertaken to identify the consumption patterns of infant and children, their susceptibility to pesticide chemicals (even in utero exposure), and the cumulative effects of pesticide residues.
Other provisions of the act include the development and implementation (EPA) of a screening program for estrogenic and other endocrine effects. The aim of this program is to identify substances that have similar effect in humans to ones produced by naturally occurring estrogen or other endocrine effects. Finally, the law establishes penalties for any person who introduces or trades food that contains pesticide residues above the tolerance thresholds.

California is the most important state in the value of agricultural production in the US. This state’s Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) is responsible for registering pesticide products and providing sale permissions in that state (DPR, 2008). Registration fees are as following: a) $750 for registering a new product, b) $750 for renewing product registration, and c) $100 for label amendment. Free of charge are the emergency exemption from registration, the special local registration and the research authorization. Registration fees exist also in other U.S.A. states like Florida, Oregon, Missouri, Kentucky, New Jersey, Washington and Virginia.

The California DPR provides public access to registered pesticides that currently amount to 13,162 products. To apply for product registration an applicant must submit an application for registration form (including the $750 registration fee), six copies of the printed label (or printer’s proof), data concerning the pesticide product, and a copy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-approved label and letter. The data concerning the pesticide product include: acute toxicology data, chemistry data, efficacy data, phytotoxisity data (if used on a plant), fish and wildlife data (if applicable), volatile emissions potential data, chronic toxicology data (if the product contains a new active ingredient to California), environmental fate data for the first agricultural use of the active ingredient in California, and medical management data (if the product contains a new active ingredient to California). All registration applications are reviewed by DPR, DPR scientists and public agencies (notified by DPR) that can be affected by pesticide use. The Pesticide Registration and Evaluation Committee (PREC) provides the forum for possible concerns on pesticides registrations raised from public agencies or even common citizens. After a product is registered, it is subject to an annual renewal fee, a quarterly mill and risk assessment, reevaluation and data call-ins.


  1. Uncertainty under a policy introduction/investment




More info available
Period 1 Period 2



State of the world State of the world

Good Do not introduce a tax

Pesticide Application Good or bad?


Tax Introduction? Bad Introduce a tax

F
Uncertainty for the state of the world
igure 27
. Two period diagram for pesticide and tax application.

Source: Author, 2008.

The imposition of a tax or levy scheme is not a costless procedure and its entire regulatory cost creates uncertainty concerning the optimal timing it is imposed. In period 1 there is uncertainty about the stage of the world. The externalities of pesticide use have not still fully documented neither the external costs have been quantified precisely. Therefore, a policy maker is not sure whether he or she has to introduce a pesticide tax now or to wait for further information and introduce it later.
Imposing a pesticide tax in period 1 (Figure 27) can proved to be more costly as there are no precise indicators of the external costs of pesticides. Therefore, this lack of knowledge can lead a policy maker to delay his intervention and to wait to identify the exact external costs of pesticides and reflect them in the prices of the different commodities by imposing a suitable tax. For instance, in the case of water pollution acting at an early stage can be burdensome while delaying can enable a policy maker to obtain accurate scientific information that reflect at a good extent the external costs of pesticides. Therefore, delaying reduces somehow the economic risk of imposing a tax scheme. On the other hand waiting can proved to be devastating in cases like biodiversity loss.

Even if new information at period 2 show that the state of the world is “bad”, a tax can be imposed after comparing and weighting the costs of introducing and not introducing a tax and the external costs of pesticides to the society as a whole. This comparison should take place as they may exist alternative and less costly ways of reducing or internalizing the external costs of pesticides.



  1. Policy Implications, Gaps and Overlaps

Reviewing the EU and non-EU pesticide policies and analyzing policy effects on competitiveness and the uncertainty concerning their time of application we identified some policy recommendations, gaps and overlaps:


- Stricter environmental regulations can trigger farmers to innovate and to improve their production efficiency.
- There are relatively few national pesticide policies that are based on economic measures/incentives in many European countries.
- Financial incentives and flexible policies can improve resource allocation. Subsidies on the adoption of environmental friendly farm practices and/or levies on pesticide use are some well known financial incentives.


      • Income support policies that focus on specific crops impact farmers’ risk attitude and lead to increased pesticide use that has negative impact on farmland biodiversity. Policies that intend to enhance biodiversity should try to modify farmers’ short run returns by alternative schemes like compensation funds. Therefore, income support policies should be re-examined by better cooperation among policy makers, environmental scientists and agricultural economists (Di Falco and Perrings, 2005; Omer et al., 2007; Heisey et al., 1997).

- An EU pesticide levy should be differentiated according to environmental hazards of different pesticides and take into account the countries' specific agronomic circumstances. Nevertheless, a pesticide tax alone cannot be an effective measure. A combination of policy instruments (taxes, subsidies, training, and research) can tackle pesticide externalities.




V. Concluding Comments

This review maps the literature on economic sustainability, biodiversity loss and, socially optimal pesticide use. The detailed database provided in this study integrates three different streams of literature: a) economic growth and the environment; b) pesticide use and biodiversity; and c) pesticide regulations.

Economic growth has a dual impact on the environment. While it is responsible for environmental degradation (e.g. through agricultural intensification), it can also serve as a mean of improving environmental quality by transfer of clean technologies, establishment of environmental institutions and enforcement of global environmental agreements. Economic growth has brought a market-oriented production as consumers are more aware of agricultural externalities and demand environmental friendly products. This consumer-oriented production is responsible for significant rural transformations, like agricultural intensification and influx of environmental friendly technologies, which have both positive and negative impacts on the natural habitat. Increased use of pesticides have a negative impact on biodiversity and as a result on agricultural productivity. Therefore, more precise applications and/or use of alternative pest control methods can protect biodiversity and farm income. Concerning pesticide policies, the present review provides evidence which shows that a socially optimal pesticide use can be achieved through the establishment of an EU wide pesticide regulatory framework based on a variety of measures, including economic incentives. This attempt requires the involvement of all the respective stakeholders that should cooperate for the establishment of flexible pesticide policies taking into account the economic and environmental impacts of pesticides. Special attention should be paid to the protection of landscape heterogeneity and farmland biodiversity that play a decisive role in augmenting crop productivity and decreasing environmental risk and yield variability.

Addressing the above-mentioned themes, a number of shortcomings have been appeared. To begin with, there is a gap in understanding and monitoring the economic and environmental impacts of pesticides. A more detailed investigation of this impact can help policymakers in designing effective pesticide policies. As it stressed throughout the literature review, biodiversity conservation should be an integral part of any pesticide policy. But this study has shown that biodiversity valuation is an ambiguous and challenging issue in a growing research field. Therefore, more research should be directed towards biodiversity valuation and formulation and practical implementation of biodiversity conservation policies.

Difficulties in monitoring the exact economic and environmental impacts of pesticides in conjunction with a lack of studies on biodiversity valuation have led to a shortage of socially optimal pesticide policies that are based on economic incentives which reflect to a great extent pesticide externalities.

References


Aaltink, A.J., 1992. “Economische Gevolgen van de Beperking van het Bestrijdings middelengebruik in de Akkerbouw”. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Altieri, M.A., 1995. Agroecology: the Science of Sustainable Agriculture. Bounder, CO: Westview Press.
Antle, J.M., 1984. “The Structure of US Agricultural Technology, 1910-78.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(4): 414-421.
Anon, 2004 "The State of Food Insecurity in the World: 2004." FAO/Economic and Social Department. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
Anon, 2003. "Herbicide use essential to crop production." Chemical Market Reporter, 18(4): 263.
Babcock, B.A., E., Lichtenberg, and D., Zilberman, 1992. “Impact of Damage Control and Quality of Output: Estimating Pest Control Effectiveness”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1): 165-172.

Balcombe, K., A., Bailey, A., Chalak, and I.M., Fraser, 2007. “Bayesian Estimation of Willingness-to-Pay where Respondents Mis-report their Preferences”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(3): 413-438.

Bauer, S., U., Hoppe, and S., Hummelsheim, 1995. “Decision Support System for Controlling Pesticide Use in Hessen”. In: Proceedings, Workshop on Pesticides, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Bekker, R.M., G.L., Verweij, R.E.N.,Smith, R.,Reine, J.P., Bakker, and , S., Schneider, 1997. “Soil seed banks in European grasslands: does land use affect regeneration perspectives?”. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34 (5): 1293-1310.
Benton T.G., J.A., Vickery, and J.D., Wilson. 2003. “Farmland Biodiversity: Is Habitat Heterogeneity the Key?”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18(4): 182-188.
Berendse, F., M.J.M., Oomes, H.J., Altena, and W., Elberse, 1992. “Experiments on the restoration of species-rich meadows in The Netherlands”. Biological Conservation, 62(1), 59-65.
Boatman N.D., N.W., Brickle, J.D., Hart, A.J., Morris, A.W.A., Murray, K.A., Murray, and P.A., Robertson. 2004. “Evidence for the Indirect Effects of Pesticides on Farmland Birds”. Ibis, 146(2): 131-143.
Bockstael, N.E., K.E., McConnell, I., Strand, 1991. In: Braden, J.B., Kolstad, C.D., Miltz, D. (Eds.), “Recreation, Measuring the Demand for Environment Quality”. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brock, W.A, and A., Xepapadeas, 2003. “Valuing Biodiversity from an Economic Perspective: A Unified Economic, Ecological, and Genetic Approach”. The American Economic Review, 93(5): 1597-1614.

Brown, R.S., and L.R., Christensen. 1981. “Estimating Elasticities in a Model of Partial Static Equilibrium: An Application to U.S. Agriculture”. In: E.R., Berndt and B.C., Field (Eds.), Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Burger, J., F., de Mol, and B., Gerowitt, 2007. “The "Necessary Extent" of Pesticide Use – Thoughts about a Key Term in German Pesticide Policy”. Crop Protection, 27(3-5): 343-351.
Cavlovic, T., K., Baker, R., Barrens, and K., Gawande, 2000. “A Meta-analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Studies”. Agriculture and Resource Economics Review, 29(1): 32-42.
Carpentier, A., 1994. “A Pesticide Ban in the Context of Intensive Cropping Technology. The Case of the French Crop Sector”. In: Michalek, J.and Hanf, C.H. (Eds.), The Economic Consequences of a Drastic Reduction in Pesticide Use in the EU. Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk Kiel KG (Christian Alberechts University, Kiel) pp. 281-303.
Carson, R.L., 1962. “Silent Spring”. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Carrasco- Tauber, C., and L.J., Moffit, 1992. “Damage Control Econometrics: Functional Specification and Pesticide Productivity”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1): 158-162.
Chalak, A., K., Balcombe, A., Bailey, and I., Fraser, 2008. “Pesticides, Preference Heterogeneity and Environmental Taxes”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(3): 537-554.
Chambers, R.G., and E., Lichtenberg, 1994. “Simple Econometrics of Pesticide Productivity”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 407-417.

Chiverton, P. A., and N.W., Sotherton, 1991. “The effects on beneficial arthropods of the exclusion of herbicides from cereal crops”. Journal of Applied Ecology, 28 (3): 1027–1039.

Commission of the European Communities, 2006. “A Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides”. Communication for the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2006) 372 Final, Brussels, Belgium.
Colyer, D., 2004. “Environmental Regulations and Agricultural Competitiveness”. Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 5(1): 70-90.
Cooper, J., and H., Dobson, 2006. “The Benefits of Pesticides to Mankind and the Environment”. Crop Protection, 26(9): 1337-1348.
Cropper, M., and C., Griffiths, 1994. “The Interaction of Population Growth and Environmental Quality”, American Economic Review, 84(2): 250-254.
Cropper, M.L., A.M., Freeman III, 1991. “Environmental health effects”. In: Braden, J.B., Kolstad, C.D., Miltz, D. (Eds.), Measuring the Demand for Environment Quality. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dasgupta, S., B., Laplante, H., Wang, and D., Wheeler, 2002. “Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1): 147-168
Dasgupta , S., B., Laplante, and N., Mamingi, 2001. “Capital Market Responses to Environmental Performance in Developing Countries”. Policy Research Working Paper; no WPS1909.

De Snoo, G. R.. 1997. “Arable flora in sprayed and unsprayed crop edges”. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 66 (3): 223–230.

DHV and LUW, 1991. “The Possibility of a Regulatory Framework for Agricultural Pesticides”. Final Report. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Di Falco S., and J.P., Chavas, 2006. “Crop Genetic Diversity, Farm Productivity and the Management of Environmental Risk in Rainfed Agriculture”. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(3): 289-314.
Dietz S., and W. N. Adger, 2003. “Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort”. Journal of Environmental Management. 68(1): 23-35.
Dinda, S., 2004. “Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey”. Ecological Economics, 49(4): 431-455.
Donald, P.F., R.E., Green, and M.F., Heath, 2000. “Agricultural Intensification and the Collapse of Europe’s Farmland Bird Populations”. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 268(1462): 25-29.
DPR, Department of Pesticide Regulation, California, U.S., 2008. Available at: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/registration/regmenu.htm#registration
Dubgaard, A., 1987. Anvendelse of afgifter til regulering af pesticidforbruget. Statens Jordbrugokonomiske Institut, Rapport 35, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dubgaard A., 1991. “Pesticide Regulation in Denmark”. In: N., Hanley (ed.), Farming and the Countryside: an Analysis of External Costs and Benefits. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 48-58.
Duelli, P., 1997. “Biodiversity Evaluation in Agricultural Landscapes: An Approach at Two Different Scales”. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 62(2): 81-91.

Ecotec, 1997. Economic Instruments for Pesticide Minimization. Ecotec. Birmingham.

Edwards-Jones, G., 2008. Do benefits accrue to 'pest control' or 'pesticides?': a comment on Cooper and Dobson. Crop Protection, 27(6): 965-967.
Elhorst, J.P., 1990. De Inkomensvorming en Inkomensverdeling in de Nederlandse Landbouw Verklaard Vauit de Huishoudproduktietheorie. LEI-onderzoeksverslag 72, Den haag, The Netherlands.
EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/
European Commission, 2007. “EU Policy for a Sustainable Use of Pesticides. The Story Behind the Strategy”. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. ISBN: 92-79-03221-6.
European Commission, 2008. “New Rules on Pesticide Residues in Food”. Directorate General for Health and Consumers. Factsheet,

Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/press/pesticide_residues.pdf. Accessed: September, 2008.


Eurostat, 2008. Statistical Office of the European Communities. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1090,30070682,1090_33076576&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL

Accessed: October, 2008.


Falconer, K., and I. Hodge. 2000. “Using economic incentives for pesticide usage reductions: responsiveness to input taxation and agricultural systems”. Agricultural Systems, 63(3): 175-194.
Falconer, K.E., 1997. Environmental Policy and the Use of Agricultural Pesticides. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, UK.

Feder, G., 1979. “Pesticides, Information, and Pest Management Under Uncertainty”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(1): 97-103.

Fernandez-Cornejo, J., S., Jans, and M., Smith, 1998. “Issues in the Economics of Pesticide Use in Agriculture: A Review of the Empirical Evidence”. Review of Agricultural Economics, 20(2): 462-488.
Florax, R.J., C.M., Travisi, and P., Nijkamp, 2005. “A Meta-analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Pesticide Risk Exposure”. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(4): 441-467.
Firbank, L., 2005. “Striking a New Balance Between Agricultural Production and Biodiversity”. Annals of Applied Biology, 146(2): 163-175.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2008. Available at: http://www.fao.org, Accessed: September, 2008.
Foster, V., and S., Mourato, 2000. “Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Pesticides Use in the UK: a Contingent Ranking Approach”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(1): 1-21.
Gaston, K.J., and J.I., Spicer, 2004. “Biodiversity: an introduction”, Blackwell Publishing. 2nd Ed., ISBN 1-4051-1857-1(pbk.)
Gotsch, N., and U., Regev, 1996. “Fungicide Use under Risk in Swiss Wheat Production”. Agricultural Economics, 14(1): 1-9.
Gren, I.M., 1994. “Regulating the farmers’ Use of Pesticides in Sweden”. In: H., Opschoor and K., Turner (Eds.), Economic Incentives and Environmental Policies: Principles and Practice. North-Holland, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Grossman, G.M., and A., Krueger, 1993. “Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”. In: Garder, P. (Ed.), The U.S. Mexico Free Trade Agreement. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 13-56.

Hall, D.C., and R.B., Norgaard, 1974, “On the Timing and Application of Pesticides: Rejoinder,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3): 644-645.

Hazell, P., and S., Wood, 2008. “Drivers of Change in Global Agriculture”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1491): 495-515.
Hawes, C., A.J., Haughton, J.L., Osborne, D.B, Roy, S.J., Clark, J.N., Perry, P., Rothery, D.A., Bohan, D.R., Brooks, G.T., Champion, A.M., Dewar, M.S., Heard, I.P., Woiwod, R.E., Daniels, M.W., Young, A.M., Parish, R.J., Scott, L.G., Firbank, and G.R., Squire, 2003. “Responses of Plants and Invertebrate Trophic Groups to Contrasting Herbicide Regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of Genetically Modified Herbicide-Tolerant Crops”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358(1439): 1899-1913.
Heard M.S., C., Hawes, G.T., Champion, S.J., Clark, L.G., Firbank, A.J., Haughton, A., Parish, J.N., Perry, P., Rothery, R.J., Scott, M., Skellern, G.R., Squire, and M.O., Hill, 2003. “Weeds in Fields with Contrasting Conventional and Genetically Modified Herbicide-Tolerant Crops.2. The Effects on Individual Species”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 358:1833-1846.
Heisey, P.W., M., Smale, D., Byerlee, and E., Souza, 1997. “Wheat Rusts and the Costs of Genetic Diversity in the Punjab of Pakistan”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3): 726-737.
Hoevenagel, R., E., Van Noort, and R., De Kok, 1999. “Study on a European Union Wide Regulatory Framework for Levies on Pesticides”. Commissioned by: European Commission/ DG XI, EIM/Haskoning, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

Holling, C.S., 1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1-23.

Horowitz, J.K., & E., Lichtenberg, 1993. “Moral Hazard, and Chemical Use in Agriculture”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(4): 926-935.
Horowitz, J.K., & E., Lichtenberg, 1994. “Risk-reducing and Risk-increasing Effects of Pesticides”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45(1): 82-89.
Jackson, L., U., Pascual, and T., Hodgkin, 2007. “Utilizing and Conserving Agrobiodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes”. Agriculture, Ecosystems and the Environment, 121(3): 196-210.
Jaffe, A.B., S., Peterson, P., Portney, and R., Stavins, 1995. “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What does the Evidence Tell us?”. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1): 132-163.
Johnsson, B., 1991. Kostnader for Begransad Anvandning av Kemiska Bekampningsmedel. Research Paper. Department of Economics Swidissh University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kesavan, P.C., and M.S. Swaminathan, 2008. “Strategies and Models for Agricultural Sustainability in Developing Asian Countries”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1492): 877-891.
Kleijn D., 1997. “Species Richness and Weed Abundance in the Vegetation of Arable Field Boundaries”. Ph.D. thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
Kleijn D., and W. J., Sutherland, 2003. “How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?”. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40(6): 947-969.

Komen, M.H.C., A.J., Oskam and J., Peerlings, 1995. “Effects of Reduced Pesticide Application for the Dutch Economy”. In: Oskam, A.J., and Vijftigschild, R., (Eds.), Proceedings, Workshop on Pesticides, August 24-27, 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Krissoff, B., N., Ballenger, J. Dunmore, and D. Gray, 1996. “Exploring Linkages Among Agriculture, Trade and the Environment: Issues for the Next Century”. Agricultural Economic Report No 738. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, May.
Kruess, A., and T., Tscharntke, 2002. “Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity”. Biological Conservation, 106(3): 293-302.
Lesinsky D., and M. Veverka. 2006. Towards Sustainable Pesticide Use in Europe? “An Effective Pesticide Use, Control and Financing (EPUC) system for the EU, Global Greengrant Fund (GGF) Edition”, CEPTA, Centre for Sustainable Alternatives, Slovakia.
Li., H., T., Grijalva, and R.P., Barrens, 2007. “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: A Meta-analysis of Environmental Kuznets Curve Studies”. Economic Bulletin, 17(5): 1-11.
Lichtenberg, E., and D., Zilberman, 1986. “The Econometrics of Damage Control: Why Specification Matters”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(2): 261-273.
Lichtenberg, E., D.D., Parker, and D., Zilberman, 1988. “Marginal Analysis of Welfare Costs of Environmental Policies: The Case of Pesticide Regulation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(4): 867-874.

Managi, S., 2006. “Are there Increasing Returns to Pollution Abatement? Empirical Analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Pesticides”. Ecological Economics, 58(3): 617-636.

Matson P.A., W.J., Patron, A.G., Power, and M.J., Swift, 1997. “Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties”. Science, 277(5325): 504-509.

McIntosh, C.S., and A.A., Williams, 1992. “Multiproduct Production Choices and Pesticide Regulation in Georgia”. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24(1): 135-144.
McNeely, J.A., K.R., Miller, W.V., Reid, R.A., Mittermeier and T.B., Werner, 1990. “Conserving the World's Biological Diversity”. IUCN, WRI, CI, WWF and World Bank.

Washington DC.



Meeus, J.H.A., 1993. “The Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes in Western Europe”. The Science of the Total Enviromnent, 129(1-2): 171-190.
Metcalfe, M.R., 2002. “Environmental Regulation and Implications for Competitiveness in International Pork Trade”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(1): 222-243.
Naeem, S., L.J., Thompson, S.P., Lawler, J.H., Lawton, and R.M., Woodfin, 1994. “Declining Biodiversity can Affect the Functioning of Ecosystems”. Nature, 368: 734-737.
Nassauer, J., and R., Westmacott, 1987. Progressiveness among farmers as a factor in heterogeneity of farmed landscapes, Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. In: M. Goigel Turner, Editor, Ecological Studies vol. 64, Springer-Verlag, New York (1987), pp. 200–210.
Nijkamp, P., G., Vindigni, and P.A.L.D., Nunes, 2008. “Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: A Comparative Study”. Ecological Economics, 67(2) :217-231.
Norgaard, R.B., 1976. “The Economics of Improving Pesticide Use”. Annual Review of Entomology, 21(397): 45-60.

North, D., 1991. “Institutions”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 97-112.

Noss, R., 1990. “Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchial Approach”. Conservation Biology, 4(4): 355-364.
OECD, 2008. “Environmental Performance of Agriculture in OECD Countries since 1990”. ISBN 978-92-64-04092-2.
OECD, 2005. “Environment and Sustainable Development. Environmental Performance Reviews-France”, Complete Edition ISBN 9264009124. vol. 2005(8): 1-251.
Omer, A., U., Pascual, and N.P., Russell, 2007. “Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in Intensive Agricultural Systems”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2): 308-329.
Oskam, A.J., H. van Zeijts, G.J., Thijssen, G.A.A., Wossink and R., Vijftgschild, 1992. “Pesticide Use and Pesticide Policy in The Netherlands”. Wageningen Economic Studies 26. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Oskam, A.J., R., Vijftgschild, and C., Graveland, 1997. “Additional EU Policy Instruments for Plant Protection Products”. Wageningen Agricultural University (Mansholt Institute), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Oude Lansink, A., 1994. “Effects of Input Quota in Dutch Arable Farming”. Tidschroft voor Sociaal Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek van de Landbouw 9, 197-217.
Oude Lansink, A., and J., Peerlings, 1995. “Farm Specific Impacts of Policy Changes on Pesticide Use in Dutch Arable Farming”. In : Oskam A.J., and R., Vijftgschild, (Eds), Proceedings, Workshop on Pesticides, August 24-27, 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Oude Lansink, A., and A., Carpentier, 2001. “Damage Control Productivity: An Input Damage Abatement Approach”. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(3), 1-12.

Oude Lansink, A. and E. Silva, 2004. “Non-Parametric Production Analysis of Pesticides Use in the Netherlands”. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1) 49-65.
Palmer, K., W.E., Oates, and P.R., Portney, 1995. “Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 119–132.
Palmquist, R.B., 1991. “Hedonic Methods”. In: Braden, J.B., Kolstad, C.D., Miltz, D. (Eds.), Measuring the Demand for Environment Quality. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PAN Europe. 2005. Pesticide taxes- national examples and key ingredients. Briefing no. 6. Available at: http://www.pan-europe.info/publications/index.shtm, Accessed: September, 2008.
Panayotou, T., 2003. “Economic Growth and the Environment”. Paper; Spring Seminar of the UN Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Italy.
Panayotou, T., 1997. “Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool”. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4): 465-484.
Panayotou, T., 1993. “Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development”, Working Paper WP238 Technology and Employment Programme, International Labor Office, Geneva, Italy.
Papanagiotou, E., 1995. “The Potential for a Substantial Reduction of Pesticide Application in Greek Agriculture”. In : Oskam A.J., and R., Vijftgschild, (Eds), Proceedings, Workshop on Pesticides, August 24-27, 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Petterson, O., J., Petterson, V., Johansson, H., Fogelfors, R., Sigvald, and B., Johnsson, 1989. Minskad Bekampning I Jordbruket; Mogligheter och Kronsekvenser. K. Skogs-och Lantbruksakademisk Tidskrift 128, 379-396.

Pimentel D., and A., Greiner, 1997. “Environmental and socio-economic costs of pesticide use”. Pages 51-78 in Pimentel D, ed. Techniques for Reducing Pesticide Use: Economic and Environmental Benefits. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Pimentel D., H., Acquay, M., Biltonen, P., Rice, M., Silva, J., Nelson, V., Lipner, S., Giordano, A., Horowitz, and M., D'Amore, 1992. “Environmental and Economic Costs of Pesticide Use”. BioScience, 42(10): 750-760.
Porter, M.E., 1991. “America’s Greening Strategy”. Scientific American, 264: 168.
Pretty J., 2007. “Agricultural Sustainability: Concepts, Principles and Evidence”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363(1491): 447-465.
Priestley, R.H., and R.A., Bayles, 1980. “Varietal Diversification as a Means of Reducing the Spread of Cereal Diseases in the United Kingdom”. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, 15: 205-214.
Roca, J., 2003. “Do individual preferences explain Environmental Kuznets Curve?”. Ecological Economics, 45(1): 3–10.
Rodrik, D., A., Subramanian, and F., Trebbi, 2004. “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development”. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2): 131-165.
Rude, S., 1992. Pesticideforbrugets Udvikling Landbrugs og Miljopolitiske Scenarier (Report No.68). Statens Jordbrugsokonomiske Institut, Copenhagen. (English Summary).

Russell, N.P., V.H., Smith, and B.K., Goodwin, 1995. “The Effects of Common Agricultural Policy Reform on the Demand for Crop Protection in the UK”. In : Oskam A.J., and R., Vijftgschild, (Eds), Proceedings, Workshop on Pesticides, August 24-27, 1995, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Saha, A., C.R., Shumway, and A., Havenner, 1997. “The Economics and Econometrics of Damage Control”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3): 773-785.
Schou, J.S., B., Hasler, and B., Nahrsted, 2006. “Valuation of Biodiversity Effects from Reduced Pesticide Use”. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2(2): 174-181.
Sexton, S.E., Z., Lei, and D., Zilberman, 2007. “The Economics of Pesticide and Pest Control”. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(3): 271-326.
SEPA, 1997. “Environmental Taxes in Sweden”. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden.
Shafik, N., and S. Bandyopadhyay, 1992. “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence”. Background Paper for the World Development Report, Washington, DC: The World Bank, USA.
Schulte, J., 1983. “Der Einluss Eines Begrentzen Handelsduenger und Pfalanzenbehandlungs-Mitteleinsatzes auf Betriebsorganisation und Einkommen Verschiedner Betriebssyteme”. Dissertation. Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms Universitat, Bonn, Germany.
Siriwardena, G.M., S.R., Baillie, H.Q.P., Crick, and J.D., Wilson. 2000. “The Importance of Variation in the Breeding Performance of Seed Eating Birds in Determining their Production Trends on Farmland”. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37(1):128-148.

Statistical Agency of The Netherlands (CBS), 2008. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/landbouw/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2006/2006-1877-wm.htm. Accessed: October 2008.

Stern, D.I, M.S., Common, and E.B., Barbier, 1996. “Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Sustainable Development”. World Development, 24(7): 1151-1160.
Stern, D.I., 2004. “The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve”. World Development. 32(8): 1419-1439.
Stoate, C., N.D., Boatman, R.J., Borralho, C.R., Carvalho, G.R., de Snoo, and P., Eden, 2001. “Ecological Impacts of Arable Intensification in Europe”. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(4): 337-365.
Talpaz, H., and I., Borosh, 1974. “Strategy for pesticide use: frequency and application”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(4): 769–775.
Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M., and F., Trebbi, 1994. More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya, Chichester: Wiley.
Tilman, D., K.G., Cassman, P.A., Matson, R., Naylor, and S., Polasky, 2002. “Agricultural Sustainability and Intensive Production Practices”. Nature, 418(6898): 671-677.
Tilman, D., J., Fargione, B., Wolff, C., D'Antonio, A., Dobson, R., Howarth, D., Schindler, W.H., Schlesinger, D., Simberloff, and D., Swackhamer, 2001. “Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change”. Science, 292(5515): 281-284.

Tilman, D., S., Polasky, and C., Lehman, 2005. “Diversity, Productivity and Temporal Stability in the Economics of Humans and Nature”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49(3): 405-426.

Travisi, C.M., P., Nijkamp, and G., Vindigni, 2006. “Pesticide Risk Valuation in Empirical Economics: A Comparative Analysis”. Ecological Economics, 56(4): 455-474.
Travisi, C.M., and P., Nijkamp, 2008. “Valuing Environmental and Health Risk in Agriculture: A Choice Experiment Approach to Pesticides in Italy”. Ecological Economics, 67(4): 598-607.
USDA, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2008. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/
Van de Zande, J.C., J.M.G.P., Michielsen, H., Stallinga, H.A.J., Porskamp, H.J. Holterman, and J.F.M., Huijsmans, 2002. “Spray Distribution when Spraying Potatoes with a Conventional or an Air-assisted Field Boom Sprayer”. An ASAE Meeting Presentation, Paper no: 021003, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Van der Vlist, A.J., C., Withagen, and H., Folmer, 2007. “Technical Efficiency under Alternative Environmental Regulatory Regimes: The Case of Dutch Horticulture”. Ecological Economics, 63(1): 165-173
Villezca-Becerra, P., and C.R., Shumway, 1992. “State-Level Output Supply and Input Demand Elasticities for Agricultural Commodities”. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 44(1): 22-34.
Wilson, C., and C., Tisdell, 2001. “Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs”, Ecological Economics, 39(3): 449-62.

World Resources Institute, IUCN-The World Conservation Union, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 1992. “Global Biodiversity Strategy: Guidelines for action to save, study and use Earth's biotic wealth sustainably and equitably”. ISBN: 0-915825-74-0
Wossink A., J., van Wenum, C., Jurgens, and G., de Snoo, 1999. “Co-ordinating Economic Behavioural and Spatial Aspects of Wildlife Preservation in Agriculture”. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(4): 443-460.
Appendix

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9


The database is protected by copyright ©hestories.info 2017
send message

    Main page