I am a Chinese citizen, I support you and arduous efforts, for your potential danger to the world peace. You must have the support of the world scientific community, the world's leading scholars of understanding is for all people and all government awareness . them is the spirit of electronic control technology enabling containment forces. you will have to present their victimization.
I support the global campaign "to stop manipulation of remote control of the body and brain (mental control) weapons on civilians of abuse." I was an electronic harassment / brain control of organized tracking of the victims.
You should now have with the various international organizations the range, if this technology installed in the satellite, it will be weapons in space technology, the whole world will be engulfed it.
You should promote the legislation, due to constraints of civilization, reasonable seized, so that the world trust between countries, the world is bright. Humanity is better.
Hello! Letter received. Thank you for the information provided. So that we can have a new understanding, formal efforts. Hoping that there will be a reasonable and legitimate solution, we will join with you in the world and against the technology efforts. these technologies will be in a civilized society into legal constraints. you doing in the community of human civilization is the rule of law \ humanity \ moral \ humanitarian \ justice \ freedom \ progress to a new height and efforts.
So that they appeal. You are "remote control to stop the body and brain control (control of) weapons on civilians cause of the abuse, the victims have to find the right way. Actually, the technology is already swamped with persecution, the world also have enormous repercussions, but some major countries did not responsible, and Russia did not learn of this technology into the scope of the law, which is to be human world to ask for is the people of the world have the same perspective. worldwide, including the United States There are also many domestic signatures, especially the United States, the victim, a representative of thousands of people have signed the unanimous request to stop the use of the citizens of the world a common voice, I think why not organize foreign victims, and to the United States Some European President and the Prime Minister is campaigning for the candidates and their political parties to the letter, this demand as part of the campaign platform, when he was in office by the people to force the elimination of such intimidation. "spirit of nuclear weapons" against the citizens, establish domestic legislation and urge the United Nations before the gaze of the development of relevant agreements, conventions, and the victims are the citizens of attention survey solution, which is supported by all peoples things, but also their own people unanimously supported matter, but also won the support of the national government, which is Each candidate speaking, no doubt after being elected by diplomatic half the success. countries in the world will support the people. also reflects the world is a messenger of peace. you say it is our view point. our country is no exception in the strongly struggle. for a better future.
With a dream, with a world. Human Living Environment is the world's citizens. Remote electronic technology and thinking feelings known directed energy weapons are quietly ran to us hit. As the aggrieved person, reasonable and inner motivation arouse the citizens of the world for peace efforts.
We read your purpose, I mentioned some suggestions, I wonder if feasible?
1. Like how to expand public awareness of the problem. Scholarships need to move several Nobel laureates wrote, mailing letters to write. Ask them to define technology and civic morality and social disaster, technology and human rights, technology and social environment, technology, and people-to-people relationship between the range, technology, and civilization, technology, and human dignity¡¡ drawn in the social reality of this of the human brain electronic perception technology on the citizen is thinking survival impasse. terrorist technology is a social, legal forms necessary to determine the absolute ban on the use of citizens, which is a terrorism techniques.
2. Convergence of this technology with satellite weapons in space it is. Become a serious danger of world peace. Hope that the world famous universities and their scientists to the scientific, moral, peaceful existence to human point of view, to the study (in fact, very mature, in the abuse) on human society should not jeopardize the kind of moral law, not by some evil forces of abuse, endangering the world-ping.
3. Urged by the European Union in the United Nations human rights organizations, the establishment of such technical reading of directed energy weapons and weapons is a weapon of war, it is necessary to enact laws in the United Nations, Russia was first enacted in 1999. Their country is a peace-loving.
4. In the world, in the famous universities in a great debate, the spirit of electronic control technology of dual-bladed. Conducted before the gaze of awareness and media coverage. Universities in the world debate. Technology and can be announced exist. States to enact laws to protect citizens. world is unsafe.
6. States and scholars issued a statement can be recommended, as well as for their own protection. Urge States Government attaches importance to the Legislative Council.
7. We can the company deserves a special radio and television reporting, we are writing to comment on their report our victimization, one day, they introduced two years time to complete it. Series of newspapers can report. Tell each of us a story of the victims. do not know success?
8. You brought into full play and write control of the spirit of struggle songs, the best can overwhelm the world, is also a kind of propaganda in every household, the world is encouraged by the survival of the victims and the spirit of struggle.
9. Countries-is important, they must have the support, in particular the EU headquarters easier. To the voters wide publicity to candidates promised if elected to the Legislative Council as the goal of the United Nations. As the world's peace envoy .
I DEMAND AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATION INTO THESE CRIMES AND HUGE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
BAIBING (aka 2010lf)
NAME: PAUL BAIRD
Year Torture/Abuse Began:
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
I SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE AND ABUSE USING DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS
PAUL BAIRD's TESTIMONY
In 1991 I wrote a political satire entitled "In the Year 2252" (P. Barber, pseudonym). Copies were circulated prematurely by a Chicago literary agent. As a result, many publishers, editors and writers accessed copies.
Before a second draft was prepared it was clear covert censorship would prevent any possibility of publication... I was already under 24 hour a day surveillance and was fielding feedback from corrupt sections of the entertainment industry; especially the media.
The reasons for their objections are many. The book was critical of many things which criminals in high places use to get what they want (and control others). Corruption, drugs, war, media deception, and all manner of immorality were openly attacked in the novel. I also lobbied on privacy laws. The personal repercussions are outlined below. (What the media did is highlighted under "Feedback")
While reading this account please keep in mind the wide reaching influence of covert agencies and organised crime throughout our community. A few "well placed" people in each area can create havoc for those being silenced. Others working with these criminals are too selfish, scared or apathetic to intervene.
Also, because wealthy criminals may make false accusations I state, as fact, that not only have I never committed any wrongdoing whatsoever but I have never even contemplated any wrongdoing. I've responded to the harassment defensively but verbally, with indignation, anger and even humour but that's all. Accordingly, any misinterpreted or "altered" writings etc should be ignored.
NOTE: Examples of feedback that made me aware of the "set up" possibilities included:-
(a) Learning (from the security/P.I industries) that the word was out to "wash your hands of it" meaning not to talk to me and (b) being referred to media identities (esp. T.V presenter M.Willesee) by one P.I who did investigate. Apparently, having sold his horse racing interests, he was to be trusted.? Having little knowledge of corruption in that industry or any other (including the drug trade/media/agency connection) I was puzzled by this. In any event, being unable to see M.Willesee I tried meeting some of his colleagues (see "Meetings" Jan 97).
The following people know who is involved:
John Howard (Australian Liberal Prime Minister). Three people (incl. a senior Federal Police executive and an ex agency member) informed me that the Prime Minister "is aware of" the situation but that "his hands are tied". Early in 1996 he did, in fact, ask the AFP to investigate the surveillance but they were unable to (efficiently) for "legal reasons". Although I was told it was because the matter was "politically sensitive".
NB: If the media could "tune in" so could the AFP. They couldn't help because of who is involved.
Ros Chilvers (Ex agency / private investigator) - She spoke with Paul Keating when he was Labor Prime Minister and told me he was actually part of the vendetta against me.
Warren College (Federal Cabinet Secretary's Office) - He spoke with current PM, John Howard, who said the situation was "too awkward" (for him to intervene). It's "awkward" because Federal Labor politicians, agency officials and the media ARE involved as are their counterparts in the US. It is, in fact, a criminal conspiracy of silence.
Steve Duffield (Ex Sen. Alston's office) - He knew and tried to help. Within a week he was gone and cannot be found.
Ms J. Bonner (Ex J. Howard's office) - Knew but now refuses to discuss it; even with liberal staffers.
Matt Francis (Sen. Newman's office) - Said many working in politics knew I was monitored/harassed because of the book, adding it had " opened his eyes" to realise the full extent of what actually goes on (i.e. political crimes).
Mick Roberts (Ex AFP) - On his retirement he told me that he'd always believed me totally but there was a wall of secrecy which he couldn't break through. No one would talk and it all "smells of journalists and politicians" he said.
Nelson Chad (Investigator/Ex policeman) - Channel 9 journalists (in particular Ray Martin and others working on "A Current Affair") were involved. This was even confirmed by one ACP director, Mr. G. Cubbin.
Note: Channel 9 owner, Kerry Packer is not the only media magnate who wants me silenced. No media player would want the general public becoming fully aware of the invasions of privacy and crimes which journalists and agency officials commit. Remember, I lobbied heavily on privacy laws for years with John Howard himself supporting my views, in writing.
Those harassed for helping me
ROSS SAUNDERS, ex head of religious programming at Ch 2. He confirmed all my suspicions about the media's involvement and advised me. He was forced to move because of the covert harassment he endured.
DAVID SANDERSON, B-Grade moviemaker. He called and volunteered to make a documentary on the covert, technological attacks on decent people who spoke/wrote about evil in high places. He said it sickened him…however, he and those he approached to help were frightened/blackmailed into dropping the plan completely.
HOMI BAHRAMALI - Neuroscience/psychiatry - Westmead Hospital. He was working on his own neurophone so his harassment was largely due to his own work. He now works at The Centre For The Mind (Sydney Uni) but is cautious about offering real help to victims, for obvious reasons.
SEAN EDWARDS, ex Special Branch (NSW Police) and AFP officers, Graham Cane, Mick Roberts, Jeff Sundin, Chris Woods and Mark Andrews also helped but weren't harassed.
Various means of harassment & persecution
Since mid 1991 I have been kept from full-time gainful employment. This is despite the fact I have degrees in Law and Economics and a solid working background that includes time with The Chamber of Commerce, a major bank and the Australian taxation office. "Instructions" were probably circulated by those involved in criminal activities. (One private investigator told me the word was out that everyone was to "wash their hands" of the matter. No-one would dare help.) Many obstacles stand between me and real work although I have been "allowed" simple work: telemarketing.
I've been followed and harassed by corrupt P.I.'s and police, however they have not accosted me at any stage.
At crucial moments, crank phone calls come through to my home. Nothing is ever said. Silence... then they hang up.
My mail (esp. from the USA) is often intercepted. IF I get it then it's either opened/annotated or a reply of little consequence. eg: one letter had a drawing of a surveillance satellite monitoring me and the words "Have a nice day".
Helicopters and small planes deliberately "buzz" my home and follow (or even hover overhead) as I walk/drive. This can happen countless times on any given day or night in clear view of friends/relatives. This can be triggered by an event (eg. Going to the mailbox), a political statement I make in private (sometimes bringing in up to three "choppers" immediately) or a time of day (e.g. when a particular Channel 9 or Channel 7 current affairs program is running).
Siren "wailing" can also be triggered in a similar manner to the aircraft harassment. Embarrassingly, these often coincide with trips to the bathroom etc. If I'm on the street, ambulances will wait on corners or stop their sirens as they approach me; often turning around (clearly going nowhere in particular).
NB: False alarms, corrupt dispatchers and bribes to pilots (for flight deviations) all help effect these forms of harassment. My enquiries revealed all of these are common practices.
From 1991 until this day I have been under 24 hour a day satellite audio/visual surveillance. The results have been made available to politicians and journalists. Private investigators confirmed that ex PM, P. Keating and Channel 9 "A Current Affair" personnel were actively involved, but there were many others. (Notably some Labor politicians worked for Kerry Packer's Channel 9 after retiring eg: Richardson, Hawke).
Without their knowledge, my relatives were also frequently monitored in the early '90's. Notably by late 1996 the direct media monitoring of the (agency) signals stopped as more advanced satellite systems were employed. It is suspected this may be due to the fact that the Liberal government (elected March '96) were not actively involved in the harassment so other means of attacking me were found. However I am uncertain of the precise reason.
Countless speeches, news items, advertisements, scripts and "writings" have been peppered with my ideas/words/phrases. These came not only from the surveillance results but also the book which, though covertly "banned" by the criminals concerned, was also extensively "used" by many writers / editors; especially those working for Rupert Murdoch (eg: Harper Collins, the Telegraph etc). Not only did I find some TV executives that admitted such thefts and harassment techniques are used, but one even openly admitted his own people were partially to blame.
Much of the feedback involves subtle but constant death threats.
Many media personnel in Sydney were clearly informed of the relevant audio surveillance frequencies and were monitoring directly until late 1996. This was made most obvious by comments made by "live to air" broadcasters (TV / radio). Clearly the presenters were signalled and "fed". With the advent of neurophone harassment and brain scanning (in my case) there was a less direct (delayed or relayed) feedback…as if the media could no longer directly monitor the signals. However, the speed of feedback picked up again in later years. In any event, the feedback of thoughts can be even more oppressive than the feedback of words…Both continue to this day.
In my case, the switch (to more advanced monitoring systems) also coincided with the PM's office instructing that I would no longer receive replies to my correspondence; though the significance may be minor. For all I know I may merely have been taking the place of another politically selected experimental target; for an illegal human research programme.
Examples of feedback (by Channel 9)
1. PROMOS - eg: Kerry Packer's ACP Director, Mr Graeme Cubbin, admitted that the "I AM CHANNEL 9" promo was in fact aimed AT me. Many of the on air presenters working at 9 featured in that ad; I believe most knew what they were doing.
2. PHRASES - eg: Just before "A Current Affair" ended on Channel 9 for 1992, then presenter Jana Wendt was quoted in a magazine as saying: "I guess I'll go to my grave not being able to think past the end of my nose", a comment I made (knowing it would be overheard) just prior to that interview (not exactly a common saying). And it was not the only reference in the article. Coincidences? Imagine such coincidences happening a dozen times a day - for years - and you'll appreciate why this "parroting" is so useful to them. It's extremely oppressive.
3. DIRECT FEEDBACK - eg: On at least two memorable occasions I responded to "live" taunts by Channel 9 employees only to have the entire transmission cut completely and immediately.
4. OTHER "COINCIDENCES" - eg: ACA, Ch.9 presenter, Ray Martin, ran an item on politicians who don't answer correspondence. They suggested viewers use a company called Voterlobby.
The link is that I'd just contacted the Prime Minister's chief of staff about my many (and various) unanswered letters to Mr Howard and his Cabinet AND had used Voterlobby to question MPs on the need for enforceable privacy laws. (Prior to being elected in March 1996 Mr Howard had been supportive of my views)
Also, on the day my mum received her cancer test results (Aug 04) Dr John Holts "cancer" treatments featured on Ch9's A.C.A. Subsequent items on Dr Holt coincided with treatment milestones for my mum. Cynical attacks like this test your patience and prove that those behind the harassment will stop at nothing.
Meetings (Jan 97)
Eg. 1 Mike Minehan (Ex Ch.9, ACA, UTS)
A security guard tried to prevent our appointment taking place; under instructions from an "unknown" outside caller. Similarly, Minehan was interrupted constantly by phone calls. On the last call he slammed the phone down exclaiming: "They're telling me to get out. Now!" However he had already told me that my situation was "not uncommon". He suggested I see Jana Wendt. He seemed genuinely worried.
Although it seems naïve now, at the time I thought journalists (et al) may help re the brainwave/neurophone torture. I even contacted one or two who had personally harassed me with surveillance feedback.
Eg. 2 Jana Wendt (Ex Ch.9, ACA, Ch.7 etc)
She was dismissed from Ch.7 just before our appointment so I visited her family home instead. She said her secretary would make another appointment but warned me that TV execs control things. (Messrs D. Leckie, Rice and others who moved from Ch.9 to Ch.7 were undoubtedly involved).
Eastwood police later harrassed me, at the request of their "friends" at Ch.7. They refused to speak to Wendt personally. I was told not to make any appointment and was taken to a psychiatric hospital as a "warning". Before I was assessed and released (by a bemused psychiatrist who saw no reason for my being there at all) "knowledgeable" staff told me that at least six others who sought assistance from Wendt had also been sent there. "This is what you get for crossing them "said one senior nurse. (They knew yet co-operated). An FOI request indicated that Detectives Pollock and Spurr were warning me on behalf of Ch7 execs but Police Internal Affairs did nothing (esp. as TV identities were involved). I also discovered that the Police "psych" (a Dr. R. Burek) had claimed that our 3 minute discussion took 45 mins and had later tried to erase his annotation claiming I suffered from "auditory hallucinations". He had to try to remove it before I got it because I hadn't mentioned that to anyone during the incident, including him. The honest psychiatrist at the hospital who had let me go also observed this but left it to me to pursue the corrupt parties.
Since this worrying episode I have learnt much about the role of mainstream media identities from agency officials, on-air targets etc. Little wonder suppression and oppression are rife in this country (and many other western "democracies"). The media mafia has far too much power.
Eg. 3 Kerry Packer (media magnate, ACP etc)
While I waited at reception Mr Packer and his son exited the car park and took the lift; James Packer looking back at me before disappearing into the elevator. Six goons then surrounded me, the leader claiming I'd been up to Packer's 3rd floor office six times. (I wasn't even sure Packer would be there. Also, this was my only visit and I was on the ground floor). When I scoffed, asking for proof of this lie, he said "Oh just get out anyway". I did. I wasn't going to give them an excuse to set something up.
N.B. Because of these experiences no further attempts have been made to resolve this situation face to face. Employees of media magnates, Singleton, Packer and Murdoch are all involved in my situation. Some, I'm told, are also involved heavily in the drug trade (hence the mafia / C.I.A links, and the technology access). It's also worth noting that in 1990-91, when this all started, all three media bosses were staunchly behind the Australian Labor Party; the central source of the problem.
However, employees of others, like Ch 7 owner Kerry Stokes, were also clearly involved.
My own situation is known to many and some of the more bizarre/significant "coincidences" have been deliberately omitted. However, the brief illustration has hopefully served its purpose.
Like the covert agencies themselves (especially the CIA), those using surveillance results to torment innocent people are little more than modern day (electronic) Nazis. Many are prominent public figures with no fear of the law and little or no respect for others. Controlling public perception / opinion through such people is a priority for both the agencies and those whose interests they protect. Obviously only those who are "co-operative" gain prominent positions within the relevant media circles. In fact some sections of the media are responsible for gross human rights abuses including (ironically) the suppression of free speech.
Once again, freedom of the press should not grant a freedom to oppress.
NB: If a target is relatively unaffected by the media feedback or "tunes out" to all media / entertainment output (to avoid the feedback / harassment) then other, more advanced forms of harassment (like the neurophone and brain wave analysers) can take their place. This switch may also occur if the agency / criminals responsible wish to prevent direct monitoring of their frequencies by the media, Federal Police etc (for whatever reason).