No Child Left Behind Blue Ribbon Schools Program U. S. Department of Education



Download 313.71 Kb.
Page3/3
Date conversion29.03.2017
Size313.71 Kb.
1   2   3

Subject_______Reading__________ Grade __7___________ Test__ITBS___________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____




2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

99

99

99

99

99

Number of Students Tested*

30

24


17

28

30

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Reading__________ Grade __6___________ Test__ITBS__________
Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____





2003-2004

2002-2003


2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

99

99

98

99

99

Number of Students Tested*

31

29

28

25

30

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0


Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Reading__________ Grade __5___________ Test__ITBS/COGAT____


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____





2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

99

99

97


95

95

Number of Students Tested

30

30

29

30

26

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Reading__________ Grade __4__________ Test__ITBS_____________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____



2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

99

97

99

99

96

Number of Students Tested*

28

30

30

30

29

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0


0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Reading__________ Grade __3___________ Test__ITBS___________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____





2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:














Total Score


94

99

97

99

94

Number of Students Tested

28

28

31

30

28

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Mathematics_______ Grade __8___________ Test__ITBS/COGAT____


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____



2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

92

94

94

99

91

Number of Students Tested

26

17

31

26

30

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed


0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Mathematics_______ Grade __7___________ Test__ITBS___________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____





2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:














Total Score


96

92

93

94

93

Number of Students Tested*

30

24

17

28

30

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Mathematics________ Grade __6___________ Test__ITBS__________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____



2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

88

95

98

96

99

Number of Students Tested

31

29

28

25

30

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed


0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject______Mathematics________ Grade __5___________ Test__ITBS/COGAT____


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____





2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:














Total Score


84

92

99

95

89

Number of Students Tested*

30

30

29

30

26

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Mathematics______ Grade __4__________ Test__ITBS_____________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____



2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:
















Total Score

94

90

92

97

81

Number of Students Tested

28

30

30

30

29

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed


0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Subject_______Mathematics_______ Grade __3___________ Test__ITBS___________


Edition/Publication Year10/99-Fall 1992; 10/00-10/01-Fall 1995; 10/02-10/03-Fall 2000 Publisher__Riverside Publishing_________
Scores are reported her as (check one) NCEs___ Scaled scores____ Percentiles__X_____





2003-2004

2002-2003

2001-2002

2000-2001

1999-2000

Testing Month

October

October

October

October

October

School Scores:














Total Score


87

92

93

92

97

Number of Students Tested*

28

28

31

30

28

Percent of total Students tested

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Number of Students alternatively assessed

0

0

0

0

0

Percent of students alternatively assessed

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%


 Due to our small student population, no subgroups were identified.

 Due to our small student population, no subgroups were identified.

 Due to our small student population, no subgroups were identified.

 Due to our small student population, no subgroups were identified.

 Due to our small student population, no subgroups were identified.

 Due to our small student population, no subgroups were identified.

Page 1 of



1   2   3


The database is protected by copyright ©hestories.info 2017
send message

    Main page