Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons and their Terrorist Use: Immediate Strategic Aspects of the Asymmetric War on the U. S

Download 283.13 Kb.
Date conversion06.11.2016
Size283.13 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   21

Our Archaic and Flawed Situation in CEM/EE Today

    Sadly, electrical engineering departments still erroneously teach EM force fields and EM transverse EM force field waves in space, which still assumes the old luminiferous material ether {28}, even though it was falsified in 1887 by the Michelson-Morley experiments {29}.

    Jackson, one of the superb classical electrodynamicists of our day, at least admits the problem and also admits that electrodynamicists continue to ignore it. He states {30}:

    "Most classical electrodynamicists continue to adhere to the notion that the EM force field exists as such in the vacuum, but do admit that physically measurable quantities such as force somehow involve the product of charge and field."

    In summary, one does not have electromagnetic force until the “force-free precursor field in space” is interacting with charged mass. It can easily be seen by examining the simple standard EM equation F = Eq, and writing it as FEq so that it becomes a true definition. Now let q = 0, as it would be in space. In that case, F = 0, even though E0. In that identity, force is the ongoing interaction  of the force-free E-field in space  with charged mass q. Given q and its interaction with force-free E, that ongoing interaction is the rigorous definition of  and generatrix for  force itself. What is missing from the identity and therefore the definition is that F and E are at right angles to each other because of the spin of the charged particles comprising q.

    Again, let q = 0, while E remains nonzero. In that case, there is no ongoing interaction of E with charged matter, since there is no charged matter. Therefore the effect of such a reaction  force F  goes to zero because there is no interaction and therefore there is no effect of an interaction. So the equation should really be written as an identity, to show clearly that force is produced by, and exists as, an ongoing interaction of the force-free

    E-field in space with charged matter q.

    The sharp-eyed reader will note that we may have (hopefully successfully!) solved Feynman’s force definition problem, at least electromagnetically: An electromagnetic force in static charged matter is identically the ongoing effect (in the static charged matter) of an ongoing interaction of the force-free EM field in space with that static charged matter. Further, the direction of the force field effect is at right angles to the direction of the primary force-free EM field in space.

    Eminent scientists such as Feynman, Wheeler, Lindsay, Margenau, Bunge, and many others have pointed out that there are no force fields in space. But our electrical engineering departments and classical Maxwell-Heaviside electrodynamicists refuse to change and correct the horribly flawed CEM/EE model.

    Repeating for emphasis, Feynman {Error: Reference source not found} stated it this way:

    "…the existence of the positive charge, in some sense, distorts, or creates a "condition" in space, so that when we put the negative charge in, it feels a force. This potentiality for producing a force is called an electric field."

    In other words, a “force-free condition in pure mass-free space”  which only has the capability to interact with a charged mass and thus create force in that ongoing interaction  is what a true E-field is. Feynman understood that true fields were naught but conditions in space itself, and change in space itself. He clearly understood that only the interaction of the field with charged mass, should some be introduced, produces EM force fields in that mass.

    So our present EEs have absolutely no notion at all of what a force-free EM field in mass-free space really is. They have never even calculated a real E-field in space, and they do not do so today nor do their professors and their textbooks.

Other Severe Foundations Errors in Our CEM/EE

    Indeed, the inane CEM/EE model still erroneously assumes a flat spacetime (falsified since at least 1916), an inert vacuum (falsified since at least 1930), and a material ether (falsified more than a century ago). It also assumes that every EM field, EM potential, and joule of EM energy in the universe is and has been freely created out of nothing at all, by the associated source charge, which is assumed to continuously emit real observable EM energy without any energy input at all. In so doing, the CEM/EE model implicitly assumes the universal violation of the conservation of energy law.

    Every EE department, professor, and textbook in the United States unwittingly advocates the total violation of energy conservation, without even recognizing it. So do our National Academy of Sciences, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, great national laboratories, our intelligence analysts  and the entire Taliban-like professional Skeptic community  by not pointing out the known terrible errors in classical electrodynamics and electrical engineering, and by not correcting the flawed model!

The Development of Scalar Interferometry

    There are two papers by E. T. Whittaker, one in 1903 {Error: Reference source not found} and the other in1904 {Error: Reference source not found}, that detail the beginning of scalar interferometry. Shortly after WW II, these two papers are what the Soviet Union scientists used as one of the starting points to develop a secret weapons science called energetics. From their new science of energetics, they first developed very powerful scalar interferometers (now possessed secretly by at least 10 nations worldwide, and even by the Japanese Yakuza). For a deeper understanding of scalar interferometry, a higher group symmetry electrodynamics must be used {Error: Reference source not found}, instead of the Standard Model’s limited U(1) electrodynamics.

    From Russia, the Yakuza also took back the actual scalar interferometry technology to Japan with them, and set up production facilities of their own. It is not the Japanese government that is doing this, but it is the Japanese Mafia and a remnant of the Aum Shinrikyo (which changed its name to Aleph). The Yakuza is very powerful, and it penetrates the Japanese government and also every large Japanese company. If one is dealing with a large Japanese company, one is dealing with the Yakuza, whether one knows it or not.

    In 1997, then Secretary of Defense William Cohen  at a conference on Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), held in Georgia under the auspices of Senator Sam Nunn  publicly confirmed this kind of electromagnetic weaponry without the technical details. He also confirmed the weather engineering, climate control, induction of earthquakes, and stimulation of volcanoes into eruption. SecDef Cohen stated {31}:

    "Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic wave. ... So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important."

    This was the first time (and to my knowledge, the only time) a high U.S. government official has openly confirmed the superweapons. So obviously certain parts of our government do know about such weapons, but there has been little or no communication of that to the public, save by SecDef Cohen’s illuminating statement.

    The news media at the time  panting heavily after the juicy Clinton-Lewinsky sex scandal  totally ignored Cohen’s epochal strategic statement. So much for the perspicacity of our news media!

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   21

The database is protected by copyright © 2017
send message

    Main page